Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sam_paine
Next article: "Study finds full body scanners effective in finding recent bomb, pat-downs failed."

You would be correct on that.

This plot was about missions from incoming flights originating from overseas airports that do not use the new bodyscanners available in the US.

M.E. airports still use metal detectors (the walk thru, and secondary hand helds) and sometimes a pat down, but not the full sexual molestation that's become de rigueur in the US.

Severe lack of explosive sniffing equipment too, of both the mechanical and four legged variety.

52 posted on 05/08/2012 11:16:11 AM PDT by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: USF
You would be correct on that. This plot was about missions from incoming flights originating from overseas airports that do not use the new bodyscanners available in the US.

Big hubs have the scanners. Small regional airports do not.

You can enter the US system ANYWHERE right now if it's a small airport and then fly to the hubs and be inside security.

It's "security farce".

Think about it. The doors are WIDE OPEN and the terrorists know it just as well as the TSA people do.

So ask yourself why they insist on forcing the masses through the gates in large cities. It's conditioning. Nothing to do with airport security whatsoever.

53 posted on 05/08/2012 11:35:17 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson