Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Hydrazine
15 posted on Wed May 02 2012 15:29:21 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) by Jack Hydrazine: “We’ve been using the “limited war” strategy since 1951 when Truman fired MacArthur because Mac was into crushing the enemy during Korea.”

I am just as unhappy as you about the division of the Korean peninsula caused by Truman firing MacArthur, but I can understand his concern about a full-blown Third World War if we engaged Mao's armies directly. We know much more today about the weakness of the respective positions of Mao, Stalin and Kim than we did in the early 1950s.

But let's for a moment grant that Truman was right. If so, then just what does Obama think could happen that is forcing us to fight a limited war now? Seems to me the best argument for encouraging the Israelis to make a full-scale attack now is to **PREVENT** a much bigger war later.

29 posted on 05/02/2012 6:20:57 PM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: darrellmaurina

It’s our rules of engagement that tie our hands and force up to fight a limited war.


30 posted on 05/02/2012 6:29:20 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson