Sorry... I don’t do “cut and paste”.
But, even if — for the sake of argument — I accepted ALL of your “talking points” as facts, Romney would STILL be a better President than than the dog-eater.
That’s the essential fact to consider. I realize that some people prefer Obama to America;s freedoms. IMHO, that is a mutually exclusive choice.
You're entitled to your own opinions, but not to your own facts. It is a FACT, well documented, that Romney has been A SUPPORTER/DOER of: global warming cap-and-trade regulation, on-demand subsidized abortion, activist liberal judicial picks, state-run health care, and support of the homosexual agenda.
"For the sake of argument" is your pretend comfort zone. These aren't "talking points" -- they are FACTS. Stubborn facts.
If you can't go to the trouble of what should be pretty basic cut-and-paste examples of lies told about Romney's record as posted here on FR, then you're all bluster.
It explains something: you'd never actually go to the trouble of examining and confirming whether claims are true. I didn't just automatically believe it when I saw Romney opposers here saying what Romney did in Massachusetts with Gay Youth Pride. I checked into it to see if it was true. I googled, I binged, I spent hours searching and reading. It wasn't the first time. Lies and false claims are made of all candidates. I've Googled, searched, and read the same with Palin, Newt, Santorum -- it's the kind of work you SHOULD do with claims whether they're in support or opposed to any candidate you're interested in, pro or con.
That you don't take the trouble to do these things explains why you're so blithely resigned to Romney, and so completely cowed to Obama the Omnipotent Oz.