After one pollster opined that a pro-life position would be a political liability for a statewide race in Massachusetts, Mitt decided to cast off his Church’s “burdensome pro-life position” and embrace wholeheartedly the Roe v. Wade position that legalized abortion-on-demand for the full nine months of pregnancy.
_________________________________________________
“Mitt decided to cast off his Church’s “burdensome pro-life position”
So the Mormon CEOs in SLC have control of what Willard does ???
Plus that “position” was not pro-life..
It is no abortions EXCEPT FOR
rape, incest, health of the mother or baby, or if the bishop has told the woman that during prayer the Mormon gods said to go ahead...
Hardly a PRO-LIFE “position”
No when the Mormon gods are PRO-ABORTION errr PRO-CHOICE...
From what I know of Mormons they are truly anti-abortion.
Just an aside. When I was being born in the 40’s for some reason my mother was having problems, it was only 5 months. My dad took her to the hospital, a Catholic hospital. The situation was grave.
The priest explained to my father that their policy was that if only one life could be saved it would be the baby. The mother had already had her chance at life and Baptism.
My father acknowledged the priest, picked my mother up in his arms and took her to the car in the parking lot and went to another, Non-Catholic hospital.
As it turns out we both survived although I had to live in an incubator for several weeks. My mother was probably already pregnant with my sister who was born 11 months after me when I came home from the hospital.
I’m not sure they had those 6 week waiting periods back then.