YOU said:
Especially, Sarah. She urged people to vote for Newt, even voted for him in Alaska, but never did anything substantive to help him... What a major disappointment. She is just as coy and diva as all the others... Now, she has plans on showing up at the convention. She did not undergo the rigors of the debates, or finance her own campaign, or had her measure again taken, but she will be there to try and prosper off the ashes of the conservatives...
BUT:
DID SARAH REALLY ENDORSE NEWT, AS IN ENDORSE? Naahhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
Such attitude against Palin WAS the reason why Palin didn’t run in the first place. Conservatives are harsh against their fellow “true” conservatives, but mild and forgiving to “fake” conservatives.
WE LIKE GOSSIPS AND OPINIONS AGAINST ... FACT.
Get over yourself. If you read my post with some comprehension, I did NOT say Sarah endorsed Newt. She urged others to vote for him, voted for him herself. I didn’t say she endorsed him.
My “attitude”, as you call it, is simply pointing out that Sarah basically sat this one out, keeping her hands clean, weakly cheerleading from the sidelines for this one and then that... She never put herself on the line. Not even you can deny that.
And if it is true, as you say, that my attitude, which consists of looking at her actions and inaction in their overall context of this primary season, and their consequences, is the reason she stayed out of the race, then she really is far more of a diva than I stated in my post.
You seem to have a little diva-ness in you. You can’t have it both ways, it’s America we’re battling to save, not any one politician’s career or viability, not even Sarah’s.
From a continuing, though disappointed Sarah fan and supporter...