Skip to comments.
The Myth of Romney
TeaPartyNation.com ^
| February 29, 2012
| Judson Phillips
Posted on 04/29/2012 1:42:32 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
And the Un-Masking of Mitt Romney, the lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal, continues . . . |
|
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton |
|
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldnt make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan |
|
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792 |
|
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams |
|
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams |
|
|
|
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: SoConPubbie
The myth of Romney is that he is electable. It is right up there with the myth he is a conservative.He is neither.
4
posted on
04/29/2012 1:53:29 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: SoConPubbie
Wow. You have more removed comments on the thread than comments. You must be over the target, you are catching some flack.
/johnny
To: EGPWS
ABL Anyone But Liberals.
/johnny
To: Admin Moderator
Why did you pull my comment?
8
posted on
04/29/2012 2:03:14 PM PDT
by
Drew68
To: SoConPubbie
The REALITY of Romney is a majority of voters chose him in the primary process.
9
posted on
04/29/2012 2:03:17 PM PDT
by
DTogo
(High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: SoConPubbie
Romney lost the nomination last time to McCain, so why is he the nominee this time?
He is a proven loser.
He generates no excitement. No one will want to work hard for him. We know he has taken opposite positions on crucial issues just a few years ago.
He would certainly do a better job managing the nation that Obama, but we worry he will ever get the chance as the author above argues.
I was at our county GOP convention yesterday and someone asked if I wanted a Romney sticker for my shirt. I declined. The most passionate delegates were the Ron Paul gang. They are still kicking even though he has no chance.
What a weird year to elect a president. Obama is a disaster and we have a dweeb at the head of the ticket.
10
posted on
04/29/2012 2:07:13 PM PDT
by
garjog
To: JRandomFreeper
Wow. You have more removed comments on the thread than comments. You must be over the target, you are catching some flack.
I suppose that's because these threads keep the hypocrisy of Mitt Supporters who are also declared conservatives up front and center and in their face.
They are a pretty conflicted bunch.
To: DTogo
The rule changing, corrupt primary process isn't over. He don't have it until the convention.
Hold them horses.
/johnny
To: SoConPubbie
And can get downright personally abusive.
/johnny
To: JRandomFreeper
True, but that's a function of twisting themselves into pretzels to back a man that on principle alone, they never would be backing.
They're full of rage that someone keeps the truth about Romney front and center.
To: garjog
Romney lost the nomination last time to McCain, so why is he the nominee this time? The fact that Candidate A lost the nomination last time to Candidate B, who then went on to lose the election to Candidate C, does not necessarily mean that Candidate A will lose to Candidate C this time. See 1976 and 1980.
15
posted on
04/29/2012 2:18:58 PM PDT
by
Charles Henrickson
(In '76 Reagan lost to Ford, who lost to Carter. In '80 Reagan beat Carter.)
To: Charles Henrickson
It does to those that want candidate A to lose to candidate C. Me not being one of them.
To: SoConPubbie
They're full of rage that someone keeps the truth about Romney front and center. The cognitive dissonance must be excruciating.
To: Keeper of the Turf
The only ones that lose if Romney or Obama is elected is conservatives.
We're screwed either way.
ABL Anyone But Liberals
/johnny
To: garjog
“Romney doesnt have the nomination and I appreciate those who are willing to oppose him and tell the truth about him and reveal his past words and stands on issues.”
I posted this on another thread, It belongs here also.
19
posted on
04/29/2012 2:30:31 PM PDT
by
duffee
(NEWT 2012)
To: JRandomFreeper
We're screwed either way.Finally, the reality of it all has hit the thread!
20
posted on
04/29/2012 2:31:44 PM PDT
by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson