I agree. Romney is Romney and he doesn’t even pretend to know for sure who he is himself. His record is solid socialist, but with all the excuses in the world for being so, he says, since he was after all in Massachusettes.
The religious liberty thing we see today was seeded up by Romney in MA already. After all, it wasn’t like it was Mormon’s who give the large damn aboug abortion, or else as a fine Bishop of his cult Romney could never have cut the mustard and force fed abortion coverage for the Catholic run institutions there.
You are right, Yash, that with Romney as president the GOPE who put him there will be quite inclined to back his socialist habits in Congress and the Senate, whereas if Obama put the same crap forward, they would fight it tooth and nail.
So, how are we so much better off with a Republikin Socialist in the White House. We run a good risk of being worse off than BLOCKING Obama from doing the identical things.
Creeps, both.
On the other hand, REBELLION IS TOO DAMN HARD AND IT”S SCARY, and the conservative cowards are falling like flies because of it.
How silly they are beginning to look trying to defend Romney, who is already at Mach IV speeding into Marxism himself, as different from Obama.
Gad.
I hate to say it, but it's starting to look that way, doesn't it? For all their bravado about being smarter, tougher, braver, and better than the lefties, the fact of the matter is that most conservatives - including those here on FR - are just spineless go-along-to-get-along wimps. Instead of helping to fight the system, they're strapping on their Rom-kneepads as we speak.
The era of an America populated by people with big dreams and the gumption to achieve them appears to be over.