Replies

To: Clintonfatigued

How is it set in stone that an 0bama defeat would bring a more conservative supreme court appointment?

After all, where is the conservative history behind Romney to guarantee this?

7 posted on 04/29/2012 6:48:05 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)

To: EGPWS; EternalVigilance

Romney’s nomination isn’t set in stone. What is set in stone is what kind of judges Obama would appoint.

9 posted on 04/29/2012 6:50:37 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A liberal's compassion is limited to the size of other peoples' paychecks)

To: EGPWS

We know what Obama will do....I would rather take a chance with Romney

10 posted on 04/29/2012 7:06:54 AM PDT by southphilly (Every State should be a right to work State)

To: EGPWS

After all, where is the conservative history behind Romney to guarantee this?

All you Romney bashers on FR need to put on your big boy pants and consider what a Eric Holder nomination to the Supreme Court would mean.

12 posted on 04/29/2012 7:35:36 AM PDT by Last Dakotan

To: EGPWS

After all, where is the conservative history behind Romney to guarantee this?

There isn't any.

75 posted on 04/30/2012 9:13:01 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794