Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SampleMan
Using your example, wouldn't that .50-70 be a black powder rifle?
I don't think I've ever seen or heard of a suppressor being worked up for one of them.
That would be a real interesting exercise in engineering.
17 posted on 04/30/2012 4:55:33 AM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Tainan
Using your example, wouldn't that .50-70 be a black powder rifle? I don't think I've ever seen or heard of a suppressor being worked up for one of them. That would be a real interesting exercise in engineering.

There is no reason it would have to be loaded with black powder. You can down load with the right smokeless powder to get subsonic velocity. Smaller cartridges are better for this though, as ignition problems start to develop for a mainly empty case, when the cases designed for black power are used.

Having said that, I'm not sure that black powder would pose a problem, except it would foul the suppressor like mad. Black power is not a high-explosive, so I would think it would make for a quieter round to begin with. I know that my old .44 cap and ball is nothing compared to a .44 mag in noise, although it produces a huge fire ball. Although black powder

18 posted on 04/30/2012 5:26:03 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson