I don’t think Romney Republicans even know what a conservative Congress would look like. And they certainly won’t attain to what they don’t even know anything about.
No. Romney’s ascendency spells more liberalism in the Congress.
With a “conservative” veneer, and a “Republican” label, of course.
No, voting for more liberalism in congress results in more liberalism. Voting for more conservatives in congress results in more conservatives. This is what I'm advocating.
By the way, your posts continue to prove the point made by the original article at the top of the thread.
I think ascribing psychological problems to those who disagree with your political strategies shows a weakness of argument.
I believe your actions will not have the result you desire; they will have unintended consequences harmful to the republic. I believe I have described why and would be willing to discuss further on this aspect.
It would be quite lame of me to say you're crazy; and, I think it pointless to deflect a political debate into a psych analysis. It becomes name-calling silliness. Rather than a reasoned analysis of the political process, elections, strategy and methodology.
In general, that's my criticism of third party folks. Most seem unwilling to look at the results of their actions in political consequences. Wisdom requires we take responsibility for the results of our actions, or that we consider them at the very least. We cannot maintain we are doing "good" when the result is, predictably, not good - more harm than if we had not acted at all.
I thank you for the cogent parts of our discussion.