Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

The topic was denial, not bookie-ism, not whether you thought you were doing the right thing. The bet offers were just a check to see if you were in touch with reality.

Your response indicates you are.

My point is the reality is your efforts are not wisely directed and will have little to no effect. Your responses indicate you agree.

Doing the right thing does not necessarily exclude doing so wisely with regard to the results and outcome.

This, again, is my point.


207 posted on 04/27/2012 5:09:49 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr

But the Obama or Romney routes are not possible for those who cannot in good conscience support evil.

So, the odds you proffer are moot.

Which means those of good conscience must find another way.

Are you aware of one other than the one I’m offering?


209 posted on 04/27/2012 5:34:37 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism. Even Jimmy Carter can be comfortable with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson