Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

Yeah, I was worried you wouldn’t get the humor. From my observations of Goode (going back to the mid ‘90s when he was still in the VA State Senate), he was one who was trying to move the Democrat party away from moonbat territory (while a respectable task, one that was far too late) and remembered what it was like when the party still had actual Conservatives in it (and not what the media calls “Conservative Dems” today, which are merely Socialist). He always conducted himself in an above-board manner without the kind of typical deceit we see in so many leftists.

Now, to answer your question, as far as I know, he did vote for Pelosi when she was the candidate for Speaker as a member of the Minority Party (since she was in no danger at that point of becoming Speaker, I choose not to crucify Goode for such a vote — I would contrast that with ex-Congressman Gene Taylor of MS who voted against Pelosi when he was in the minority, but “proudly” cast a vote for her in January 2007 when it did matter, a kind of rank hypocrisy that thankfully contributed to his eventual defeat last year). His real courageous vote was for Clinton’s impeachment in 1998. By then it was apparent he had very little in common with his lifelong party and he switched a little over a year later (first to Independent, and then 2 1/2 years later to GOP). There was nothing off the top of my head that I found objectionable in his voting record from that period onward (if anything, getting unshackled from the Democrats allowed him to move fully rightward).

Add to that that he had the courage to speak out against Mohammadanism at a time when so many other Republicans would cower (and it quite possibly had some effect on losing reelection in 2008).

The sole reason, as you cited, is the Constitution Party’s unfortunate prior paleo/libertarian stance on foreign policy/defense, but I think with Goode’s nomination, it moves it away from that to a more reasonable and sensible stance.


190 posted on 04/27/2012 1:29:57 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

Having some up close first-hand experience in dealing with the CP, I remain highly skeptical.


191 posted on 04/27/2012 1:33:24 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Romney Republicanism. Even Jimmy Carter can be comfortable with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj; EternalVigilance
The sole reason, as you cited, is the Constitution Party’s unfortunate prior paleo/libertarian stance on foreign policy/defense, but I think with Goode’s nomination, it moves it away from that to a more reasonable and sensible stance.

I sure hope so, but from the sound of this statement right here, Goode may have changed his stances at least somewhat to accommodate them. Quote: "Goode says that he regrets his vote for the Patriot Act and now wants it repealed. He also wants to withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan." http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2012/04/virgil-goode-speech-on-c-span/


230 posted on 04/27/2012 10:26:51 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Our Joe Wilson can take the Dems' Joe Wilson any day of the week)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Yeah, I was worried you wouldn’t get the humor.

This happens to me all the time.

Both as sender and recipient.

237 posted on 04/28/2012 4:43:35 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson