No, we are not considering it. I posted what would happen and what FR would look like if we did.
And no I will not bend to the political winds. FR is and will remain a pro-life, pro-family, pro-small government site. This is non-negotiable, non-debatable. To hell with the abortionist ROMNEY and the big tent, big government RINO GOP-e. To that extent, on FR it is my way or the highway.
You know, I don't know why this would be a surprise to anyone.
Most of the mega-MSM venues are usually outspokenly pro-abortion. You don't expect them to spout something pro-abortion one day in their editorial policies & columns, and then something pro-life the very next day.
Oh, sure they may have LOTS of diverse writers writing the editorials. In many venues, 'tis all pro-abortion.
Oh, sure -- for the newspapers of the lot -- lots of readers contribute letters-to-the-editor, including pro-lifers.
But for some reason, the best pro-life letters-to-the-editors never make it in print in those particular dinosauer outlets.
And the editorial outputs -- the columns, the editors' stuff in many/most of these venues?...it's all pro-abortion.
Just because some liberal MSM have policies that allow for opposing stances doesn't = most of them being that way.
you miss the point, Jim