Good.
I don't really know any authentic conservatives, patriots who'd want you to--at least not off the top of my head.
I would appreciate some help with how to respond, though to the following.
I also don't know anyone who thinks that OThuga and Marxist Mitt are identically 100% equal in their destructiveness toward:
A) God
B) Life
C) Family
D) The Constitution
E) Freedom
F) The health of the Republic of the US of A
G) Homosexuality
H) abortion, planned genocide, euthanasia, UN agenda 21,
I) Big government
J) satanic Marxist NWO global government
K) Islam
etc.
I don't know how even I'd rate the two traitors on the above . . . whether I'd rate OThuga 100% and Marxist Mitt 95% destructive or OThuga 100% and Marxist Mitt 85% or what. But I would rate OThuga very detectably worse than Mitt.
And I know a lot of people--sometimes including the one in my mirror on some days--who cannot rationalize doing anything to contribute to OThuga--A WORSE DESTROYER on all the things we hold dear--getting into office another 4 years.
The Supreme Court issue is a serious concern to many of my loved ones on such scores.
Personally, I still do not think it makes a significant bit of difference how we vote. I believe the puppet masters control enough of the voting machines and other corrupt vote rigging practices that they will install whomever they have selected for the next 4 years.
Nevertheless, I believe that we are duty bound before God to exercise our right to vote as prayerfully and logically and patriotically in behalf of our cherished values as well as we can. This issue is just very troubling--sometimes to me and certainly to several I love. How can we rationally justify doing ANYTHING that results in the WORST of the two satanic evil Marxist weasels another 4 years?
I'm really not being cheeky. I'm seriously seeking your wisdom and advice on this conundrum. OThuga is sooooo demonized, sold out to Marxism and satanic Islam . . . that sometimes he makes ANYONE else seem like they are Marxist lite.
Normally, I don't have that much trouble deciding between damned if we do and damned if we don't double bind conundrums. But this one has me a bit stumped.
God before country, my FRiend
I’m staying out it this year. There’s no way I will support Romney in any way. I was hoping there were enough good conservative people left in this country to push for Sarah but have been amazed at what has happened. When I realized that even a great majority of those who call themselves conservatives weren’t going to stand on principle I was convinced that Newt was the closest we had to a conservative that I thought could carry the national vote. When even those who call themselves Tea Party Patriots started to back Romney I knew that if a brokered convention doesn’t materialize and work what this country is going to get is total shock. We will have to pick up the pieces and start anew.
Evil doesn't present itself identically equal - that does not mean it not equally evil. This, IMO, is a test (maybe last) to see if one can be drawn into evil at all.
I can't! I support and voted for Newt. I don't have the worries/concerns of those who didn't support him. Did I chose wisely according to my beliefs, you betcha. To go against them, would show the foundation was built on sand and therefore, not the right foundation.
I agree, but that is precisely what the GOP-e did in putting forth Romney as the nominee. He has an (R) next to his name so he won't pull off many (D) votes from Obama, and he's so closely matched to all of Obama's administrative history that no conscientious Conservative will vote for him: there is no way he can beat even the worst President in our history, why, then, would he be put forth as the only candidate who can beat Obama. It is totally illogical unless the GOP-e prefers another Obama presidency to a Conservative one.
I would say rather that he makes anyone seem Conservative by comparison - even Bill Clinton seems Conservative compared to Obama, so why does Mitt Romney look like he has so much in common with him?!