[Be Free]

Look, I fully agree that Romney is not my first choice - Newt is. Not my second choice either - that would’ve been Cain or maybe Perry. But at some point we need to realize that Romney is going to be the nominee, like it or not. The battle in November is going to be Obama or Romney. As imperfect as that is, it is a no-brainer choice.

So we can gnash our teeth, stomp our feet, pound our fists, or talk about write-in campaigns. All that does is improve the chances for 4 more years of Obama, which is unacceptable, and would be intolerable.

So at what point to we stop burning down our own house and focus on the real objective of un-seating Obama?

[Josh Painter]

Just a reminder: The “lesser of the evils” is, by definition, evil.

[cripplecreek]

So at what point to we stop burning down our own house and focus on the real objective of un-seating Obama?

If you don't have the courage to acknowledge your own house has become a sewer, you don't have much chance of unseating Obama anyway.

[SoConPubbie]

So we can gnash our teeth, stomp our feet, pound our fists, or talk about write-in campaigns. All that does is improve the chances for 4 more years of Obama, which is unacceptable, and would be intolerable.

And you can stick your fingers in your ears and cover your eyes to hide from the record of that lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal Mitt Romney all day long, but it's not going to change the fact that the only thing inevitable about Mitt Romney is that he is the only candidate BECAUSE OF his lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal record that GUARANTEES Obama's re-election.

Why do you think the media has treated him with kid's gloves up to this point?

Why do you think George Soros stated he wanted Romney as the GOP candidate because his record was so like Obama's?

The media and Obama would like nothing else to campaign against a candidate like Romney who has had the same positions on so many issues as Obama.