Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Longbow1969

“Santorum did better than Newt, but he never had a chance to win because too many conservatives recognized he could never win a national general election.”

1 - Both Santorum and Newt were second tier, mediocre (at best) candidates.

2 - It amazes me that some Newt supporters are myopic enough to think that Newt could have won the general. Santorum had a better shot by far.

I thought this election would be an inspiration and a chance for conservatism to blossom. Far from it!

However, anyone thinking that another four years of 0 is preferable to Romney is severely delusional. We can’t afford 0’s spending, and we REALLY can’t afford any SCOTUS picks of his.

I’m sure many that’re saying they’ll not vote, or will vote third party will instead come to their senses by November.


248 posted on 04/25/2012 3:53:25 PM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Pray for America!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: PreciousLiberty

We differ on the Newt/Santorum issue, but I agree with everything else in your post. It is definitely a huge letdown to wind up with Romney after all the excitement in 2010. Saying that, I agree we have to vote for the only candidate that has any chance of beating Hussein - even if only to stop the Supreme Court from going hard left. Most of this talk about not voting or voting 3rd party will diminish as we get closer to November.


251 posted on 04/25/2012 4:03:02 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson