To: arderkrag
There’s nothing remotely rational about the ABO crowd. We're in good company at least, the ABO side includes Palin, Bachmann, Cain, Santorum and Newt, who does the "I won't vote for Romney crowd" have on their side? regressive wackos and socialists. I prefer the ABO crowd.
To: Ballygrl
Riiiight. We’re regressive wackos. That makes perfect sense. At least we aren’t supporting a liberal Marxist who wrote the frame work for Obamacare.
196 posted on
04/25/2012 11:06:13 AM PDT by
arderkrag
("WAAHH WAAAHHH SCOTUS" is no excuse to vote for Romney. LOOKING FOR ROLEPLAYERS. Check Profile.)
To: Ballygrl
who does the "I won't vote for Romney crowd" have on their side? regressive wackos and socialists.
LOL, seriously??? you might want to aquaint yourself with this post for starters:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2871012/posts
And what do you actually mean by "regressive"? Regressing from where and to where? I'm curious.
199 posted on
04/25/2012 11:15:11 AM PDT by
kevcol
To: Ballygrl; Jim Robinson
who does the "I won't vote for Romney crowd" have on their side? regressive wackos and socialists.Jim, I had no idea you were a socialist. After all these years. ;)
/johnny
To: Ballygrl
214 posted on
04/25/2012 1:01:13 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(There's no crying in rebellion!!)
To: Ballygrl
Sarah and Todd voted for Newt. Did you? Did you $upport his campaign?
If you didn’t, don’t claim you are on their side but on the ‘any dog will do’ side.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson