I’d say ignore it. Unless the government plans to spend billions of dollars placing a full time inspector on every family farm in America it’s unenforceable anyway.
A full time inspector would mean more government jobs, more Obama support and they are paid for with your tax money. It seems likely to me.
“Hold it right there. You men from the bank?”
“You Wash’s boy?”
“Yessir and Daddy told me I’m to shoot whoever’s from the bank.”
“Well, we ain’t from the bank young feller.”
“Yessir, I’m also s’posed to shoot folks serving papers.”
“We ain’t got no papers neither.”
“I nicked the census man.”
“Now there’s a good boy.”
Problem is.. the public school system is programming the kids to rat out their parents. They don’t even enforcement personal to find the violators.
The kids who don’t want to do the work will simply turn their parents in.
Problem is.. the public school system is programming the kids to rat out their parents. They don’t even need enforcement personal to find the violators.
The kids who don’t want to do the work will simply turn their parents in.
Yes, but they can then use it to harass those certain citizens that they might feel need to be dealt with.
thats what the drones flying around are for.
>>>Unless the government plans to spend billions of dollars placing a full time inspector on every family farm in America it’s unenforceable anyway.<<<
Which is the goal, in my opinion. The idea is to create so many overlapping and unenforceable laws and rules that people are always looking over their shoulders, sort of a low-key version of the Great Terror. A secondary purpose is to give the state the ability to prosecute people when it chooses, perhaps in retribution, perhaps for show, and perhaps from sheer bureaucratic lack of coordination.
We’ve had a lot of practice in this regard concerning drug laws, especially marijuana, but there are plenty of other examples in our daily lives where the government makes regulations that it cannot or won’t enforce. Border protection is another example. Selling whole milk. Having a toilet that flushes more than 1.6 gallons. On and on.
In any case, this kind of bureaucratic rule-making has the impact of reducing the rule of law to mockery. God help us.
The point is not about being universally enforceable, it is a new tool for any LEO with an agenda. If they made breathing illegal it would be unenforceable too. Then, anyone can be arrested.
Maybe the domestic drones can spy on the 4-H kids doing “unauthorized” farm tasks and fire a few Hellfire missiles as a friendly reminder.