Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie

Remembere these?

To: Fred
Newt is a real Turd where conservatism is concerned:

GOP Debate: Newt Gingrich Admits 1986 Amnesty Failed, But Would Do it Again
2 posted on November 24, 2011 9:51:19 PM CST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: zeebee
Newt orchestrated the takeover of the first republican congress in 40 years, and made it work. That’s good enough for me.

Newt voted to create the Department of Education.

Newt voted for the Amnesty.

Newt voted to lock up 65 million acres of Alaskan wilderness.

Newt voted to give China Most favored Nation status.

Newt pushed the liberal Scozzafazza in NY23( a GOP district) when there was a perfectly good conservative running in the race.

Newt is for the Individual Mandate where Health Insurance is concerned.

Newt is for a limited Amnesty.

Depending on the day of the week, Newt believes Global Warming is real.

We need a conservative, not a moderate globalist.
6 posted on November 24, 2011 9:58:18 PM CST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: zeebee
Anybody not pushing Illegal Immigration and bigger government and globalism.

All of the candidates, with the possible exception of Romney and maybe Huntsman are solid on the social issues, that leaves the rest. So, in my opinion, in order of strength of conservative positions on the issues and electability (with conservative issue positions taking priority):

1. Cain
2. Bachmann
3. Perry
3. Santorum
3. Gingrich
3. Paul

Out of all the 3’s, I could only possibly vote for Santorum. Both Perry and Gingrich with their Open-Border positions will never get my vote while Paul will never get my vote because of his wacked-out Foreign Policy positions. 5.
17 posted on November 24, 2011 10:10:54 PM CST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: xzins
What a crock. You and I both know that when June 5 rolls around, you won’t be voting for Cain. It will be all over by then. And you’ll be whining about the lack of true conservatives in the field, just like now.

Really?

At this stage of the game in the 2008 election did you think McCain was going to be the Nominee?

And I have news for you, come November 2012, if the Republican Nominee is Romney/Newt/Perry, I’ll be voting 3rd party, period.

I will not vote for someone willing to sell my country down the river because they want to give Amnesty to a bunch of invaders.
50 posted on November 24, 2011 10:53:57 PM CST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

Those are just from one thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2812088/posts

So did Newt suddenly become a conservative in the past 5 months, or are you going to throw away your principles and vote for someone you said you could never vote for? Why are you pushing so hard for someone you said failed at conservatism?


7 posted on 04/22/2012 4:34:33 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Raider Sam

Newt didn’t look too conservative to me when he camped his fat ass on the sofa with Miss Nancy pushing the idea of global warming being man’s fault.


9 posted on 04/22/2012 5:33:54 PM PDT by tatown ( FUMD, FUAC, and FUGB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Raider Sam
As and Jim Robinson said, you go to war with the army you have. Newt was not my first choice, and yes, I advocated for Sarah, and then the Pizza Guy, and then Newt after comparing his record to that lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal, it was not a hard conclusion to come to. And yet, here you are, promoting that lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal Mitt Romney, when there are 46% of the delegates yet to be won and even after Jim has made it clear that there will be no promoting of Mitt Romney on this site exactly because he is a lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal.

Oh, and here you are:

Friday, February 10, 2012 7:42:23 AM · 19 of 68
Raider Sam to mnehring

Yes we can!!!! Sometimes you have to suspend conservatism to save conservatism, especially if it helps beat that evil, soulless Romney!

Can you say hypocrite?

So, I have to ask you, what's your point?
13 posted on 04/22/2012 7:05:37 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Raider Sam
And I have news for you, come November 2012, if the Republican Nominee is Romney/Newt/Perry, I’ll be voting 3rd party, period.

Well, I had to change didn't I?

Most people do.

But the problem is, Romney doesn't have a thing to his record to recommend him to conservatives, while the other two in that comment do.

Romney, being the lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal he is, can never be redeemed.
15 posted on 04/22/2012 7:11:41 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson