1 posted on
04/20/2012 2:36:07 PM PDT by
Iam1ru1-2
To: Iam1ru1-2
Here’s the video. Sorry it’s a Media Matters link. Definitely one of the more contentious interviews O’Reilly’s had recently. He and the women grew to visibly and venomously hate each other during these 4 minutes.
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201203260005
2 posted on
04/20/2012 2:41:08 PM PDT by
JediJones
(From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
To: Iam1ru1-2
3 posted on
04/20/2012 2:41:08 PM PDT by
Not A Snowbird
(Never borrow batteries out of your smoke alarm!)
To: Iam1ru1-2
The organization the woman represents is a progressive [regressive] organization wrapped in a conservative name.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Constitution_Society
The American Constitution Society for Law and Policy (ACS) is a liberal legal organization that promotes the U.S. Constitutional values of “individual rights and liberties, genuine equality, access to justice, democracy and the rule of law.” [2] The American Bar Association Journal described it as “the left-leaning equivalent of the Federalist Society.”[3] For example, they have challenged the “originalism” interpretation of the Constitution.[4] ACS was formed in 2001 at Georgetown Law Center by then-law professor Peter J. Rubin.
ACS has 13,000 members, 165 student chapters and lawyer chapters in 32 cities. It is headquartered in Washington, D.C. The organization promotes and facilitates discussion and debate of progressive public policy ideas and issues, providing forums for legal scholars, lawmakers, judges, lawyers, public policy advocates, law students and members of the media.
4 posted on
04/20/2012 2:43:42 PM PDT by
JediJones
(From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
To: Iam1ru1-2
” rebut it, if you can. “
Standard ‘Progressive’ rebuttal #1(c) —
“Oh yeah?? Why should we pay attention to a buncha white male slaveowners?? That’s RACIST!!!!”
5 posted on
04/20/2012 2:44:06 PM PDT by
Uncle Ike
(Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
To: Iam1ru1-2
The interstate commerce clause is one of the most abused. My father used to scream about this. It only allowed him to sell in certain states. Congress and Presidents have abused this law forever. Using it for bad purposes has been very useful for the Senate since I believe the 20’s.
The Senate and Interstate Commerce bigest crime committed.
6 posted on
04/20/2012 3:07:42 PM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Iam1ru1-2
I still wonder why, given the ICC, states are allowed to ban, say, the importation of milk from another state. It strikes me as a practice Congress could constitutionally forbid. It just causes consumers to have to pay more for milk.
For the benefit of the "family" farm, of course.
7 posted on
04/20/2012 3:29:35 PM PDT by
BfloGuy
(The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
To: Iam1ru1-2
The founders of this great nation were so brilliant that even today their foresight is showing us the way to real freedom and societal security. Out with the Marxists and their “Progressive” power grab.
8 posted on
04/20/2012 3:31:10 PM PDT by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Iam1ru1-2
The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.
Now it is exactly the reverse. Thanks largely to the very government branch dedicated to protect it, the Supreme Court and by an complicant Congress.
The Constitution is dead. Murdered in it's crib by liberals who believe in the so-called "Living Constitution" and the viewpoint "The Ends justify the Means"
Thus dies a republic.
9 posted on
04/20/2012 3:43:07 PM PDT by
RedMonqey
(Men who will not suffer to self govern, will suffer under the governent of others.)
To: Iam1ru1-2; Don Corleone
The Framers specifically considered and rejected expansive powers over commerce, agriculture and manufactures
here.
Wickard v. Filburn and all subsequent federal intrusion is commerce clause baloney.
11 posted on
04/20/2012 4:04:58 PM PDT by
Jacquerie
(No court will save us from ourselves.)
To: Iam1ru1-2
Wonderful Thomas Sowell article on the commerce clause
here.
13 posted on
04/20/2012 7:23:07 PM PDT by
MV=PY
(The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson