Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/20/2012 2:36:07 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Iam1ru1-2

Here’s the video. Sorry it’s a Media Matters link. Definitely one of the more contentious interviews O’Reilly’s had recently. He and the women grew to visibly and venomously hate each other during these 4 minutes.

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201203260005


2 posted on 04/20/2012 2:41:08 PM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Bump for later


3 posted on 04/20/2012 2:41:08 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Never borrow batteries out of your smoke alarm!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2

The organization the woman represents is a progressive [regressive] organization wrapped in a conservative name.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Constitution_Society

The American Constitution Society for Law and Policy (ACS) is a liberal legal organization that promotes the U.S. Constitutional values of “individual rights and liberties, genuine equality, access to justice, democracy and the rule of law.” [2] The American Bar Association Journal described it as “the left-leaning equivalent of the Federalist Society.”[3] For example, they have challenged the “originalism” interpretation of the Constitution.[4] ACS was formed in 2001 at Georgetown Law Center by then-law professor Peter J. Rubin.

ACS has 13,000 members, 165 student chapters and lawyer chapters in 32 cities. It is headquartered in Washington, D.C. The organization promotes and facilitates discussion and debate of progressive public policy ideas and issues, providing forums for legal scholars, lawmakers, judges, lawyers, public policy advocates, law students and members of the media.


4 posted on 04/20/2012 2:43:42 PM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2

” rebut it, if you can. “

Standard ‘Progressive’ rebuttal #1(c) —

“Oh yeah?? Why should we pay attention to a buncha white male slaveowners?? That’s RACIST!!!!”


5 posted on 04/20/2012 2:44:06 PM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2

The interstate commerce clause is one of the most abused. My father used to scream about this. It only allowed him to sell in certain states. Congress and Presidents have abused this law forever. Using it for bad purposes has been very useful for the Senate since I believe the 20’s.

The Senate and Interstate Commerce bigest crime committed.


6 posted on 04/20/2012 3:07:42 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2
I still wonder why, given the ICC, states are allowed to ban, say, the importation of milk from another state. It strikes me as a practice Congress could constitutionally forbid. It just causes consumers to have to pay more for milk.

For the benefit of the "family" farm, of course.

7 posted on 04/20/2012 3:29:35 PM PDT by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2

The founders of this great nation were so brilliant that even today their foresight is showing us the way to real freedom and societal security. Out with the Marxists and their “Progressive” power grab.


8 posted on 04/20/2012 3:31:10 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2
“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.

Now it is exactly the reverse. Thanks largely to the very government branch dedicated to protect it, the Supreme Court and by an complicant Congress.

The Constitution is dead. Murdered in it's crib by liberals who believe in the so-called "Living Constitution" and the viewpoint "The Ends justify the Means"

Thus dies a republic.
9 posted on 04/20/2012 3:43:07 PM PDT by RedMonqey (Men who will not suffer to self govern, will suffer under the governent of others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2; Don Corleone
The Framers specifically considered and rejected expansive powers over commerce, agriculture and manufactures here.

Wickard v. Filburn and all subsequent federal intrusion is commerce clause baloney.

11 posted on 04/20/2012 4:04:58 PM PDT by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Wonderful Thomas Sowell article on the commerce clause here.
13 posted on 04/20/2012 7:23:07 PM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson