Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedumb2003
My point is the fundamental platform, not the capabilities.

Well, you said "thrust vectoring of the F-22 and F-35."

The "fundamental platform" difference between the F-22/F-35 and earlier generation aircraft is stealth.

17 posted on 04/18/2012 7:24:39 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

>>Well, you said “thrust vectoring of the F-22 and F-35.”<<

I stand corrected (sort of) — the fact both have thrust vectoring, no matter how it is used, is an example of the incrementalism I decry. But I concede the point that the thrust vectoring on the F-35 is much more limited than how it was designed to be used on the F-22.

>>The “fundamental platform” difference between the F-22/F-35 and earlier generation aircraft is stealth.<<

Then why was the F-117 retired so soon?

Stealth is a great technology but it isn’t even close to the fundamental game-changing understanding of physics and engineering (complementary but not equal) that produced the F/16, F(A)/18, F/14 and the F/15. The F/22 “goosed” the platform but wasn’t fundamental at all.


19 posted on 04/18/2012 7:33:10 AM PDT by freedumb2003 ('RETRO' Abortions = performed on 84th trimester individuals who think killing babies is a "right.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson