Newt Gingrich believes Michelle Obama's butt is THIS big...
While Mitt Romney insists Michelle Obama's butt is only this big...
Not making fun of your post, it just made me think of this gag. ;)
Thanks, copied, printed, will give to party official.
That’s why I’m not voting GOP this time around. I never had a chance to cast a vote for Gingrich here in VA, and just can’t bring myself to score one for Romney. This, unless some miracle of miracles happens and Romney gets kidnapped by aliens and Newt gets the nomination by default.
Otherwise, it’s the Constitution Party for me.
Whoa!!
How to get this to the masses?? Will tweet it myself. People should all tweet and facebook this list.
If only all the people I know who think mitt would be great for the economy could see this! It’s amazing.
(with newt foaming over the abuelitas, I still see him as pro amnesty — only quibble I have with it)
Now we will see who the fakers are.
Nobody ever said Mitsy was conservative, just more conservative than Obama
I don’t see how anybody would not vote for Newt if they had seen Newt at ORU. He’s the only candidate with a reasonable plan to reverse America’s decline into communism and rebuild free market capitalism. Some FReepers would throw America’s future away because he sat on a sofa with Nancy the Nazi, incredible!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UenFM3skhew
Thanks. This confirms the candidate test I took that showed Obama represents me better than Romney does. Not that I can stomach the commie Muslim. Just, Romney is even further to the left.
Amazing.
To make it clearer, let me provide the context:
To recoil before an enemy, or to keep silence when from all sides such clamors are raised against truth, is the part of a man either devoid of character or who entertains doubt as to the truth of what he professes to believe. In both cases such mode of behaving is base and is insulting to God, and both are incompatible with the salvation of mankind. This kind of conduct is profitable only to the enemies of the faith, for nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good. Moreover, want of vigor on the part of Christians is so much the more blameworthy, as not seldom little would be needed on their part to bring to naught false charges and refute erroneous opinions, and by always exerting themselves more strenuously they might reckon upon being successful. After all, no one can be prevented from putting forth that strength of soul which is the characteristic of true Christians, and very frequently by such display of courage our enemies lose heart and their designs are thwarted. Christians are, moreover, born for combat, whereof the greater the vehemence, the more assured, God aiding, the triumph: "Have confidence; I have overcome the world." (John 16:33)From a letter by Pope Leo XIII (1890), On Christians as Citizens
To support a pro-abort, homosexualist chameleon solely because he might not be as bad as Øbama is the height of cowardice and displays conduct unworthy of a Christian.
So, are you reccomending Mitt Obama, or Hussein Romney?
.
Jim,
You made my list look paltry and extremely un-researched by comparison.
My hats off to you!
Not making fun of your post, it just made me think of this gag. ;)
I voted for Newt in the primary here in Oklahoma.
Mitt or Obama will bring the same result at some point...
BTTT
Who is the Constitution Party and/or (gag) Libertarian party candidates?
I’d vote for either over Romney, even the pot-smoker from New Mexico. He’s a pro-abort, but woudl leave it to the states, and people would have to pay for it themselves. Sadly, that’s a huge improvement.
Thank you! Great list!
Fortunately those with eyes can see the ‘obvious’ choice is Newt over Romney....and in the General Newt will slay the dragon!
Go Newt Go!!!!!
http://julieborowski.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/saynotonewt.pdf
Out of curiosity, are there excuses for all of that too? I’m just curious.
Great chart.
Says it all.