Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Agamemnon

Your plan has as much chance of happening as me being coronated king of Sweden. Why would Romney put people in his cabinet with whom he has profound political disagreement? Why would they accept a position in the cabinet of a man with whom they disagree and in many cases, do not like? These people know that once Romney is elected that they would have absolutely no influence over him. Romney didn’t campaign to have his political enemies run the show.


55 posted on 04/16/2012 7:55:44 AM PDT by CommerceComet (If Mitt can leave the GOP to protest Reagan, why can't I do the same in protest of Romney?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: CommerceComet; ZULU
Why would Romney put people in his cabinet with whom he has profound political disagreement? Why would they accept a position in the cabinet of a man with whom they disagree and in many cases, do not like?

To influence the direction of policy formulation and the debate in general, one might suppose. It's how the game is played. I haven't heard any one amongst those who ran say that they didn't "like" someone personally. They might not have liked what someone else did, an ad someone ran perhaps, or didn't like the outcome of a primary, but I think most of the "personal" vitriol happens on discussion boards.

Smart campaigners keep their emotions in check. Santorum was not more clever than Obama in this regard in all this Trayvon Martin brouhaha for example. Posters to blog boards don't have that emotion check constriction, either, largely due to the fact posters to boards are anonymous.

These people know that once Romney is elected that they would have absolutely no influence over him.

That's not what I hear from the likes of Palin, Gingich, West, McDonnell, Haley, Ayotte, and a host of other Tea Party republicans who are actually holding or have held elective office.

Romney didn’t campaign to have his political enemies run the show.

They may have been his primary opponents, but I hardly think as strategic-thinking and savvy a business alliance builder as he is, he sees only "enemies" --- as a host of posters around here have made of the opposing candidates who were not their first favorites. I think he sees allies.

I think he's looking at a lot of scrappy fighting allies in the battle for this fall's elections. And he'll need every one of them. And if he's as smart as he's shown himself to be in alot of ways on a lot of things, he will employ their skills in the larger effort of winning.

Depressed losers is what we have to make the DNC.

I think there's too many on this board too willing to give up -- and Obama's minions just laugh for what ineffective fools they've made of their opposition without having to even try or even spend a dime to make it happen.

FReegards!


62 posted on 04/16/2012 11:07:04 AM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: CommerceComet; ZULU
Why would Romney put people in his cabinet with whom he has profound political disagreement? Why would they accept a position in the cabinet of a man with whom they disagree and in many cases, do not like?

To influence the direction of policy formulation and the debate in general, one might suppose. It's how the game is played. I haven't heard any one amongst those who ran say that they didn't "like" someone personally. They might not have liked what someone else did, an ad someone ran perhaps, or didn't like the outcome of a primary, but I think most of the "personal" vitriol happens on discussion boards.

Smart campaigners keep their emotions in check. Santorum was not more clever than Obama in this regard in all this Trayvon Martin brouhaha for example. Posters to blog boards don't have that emotion check constriction, either, largely due to the fact posters to boards are anonymous.

These people know that once Romney is elected that they would have absolutely no influence over him.

That's not what I hear from the likes of Palin, Gingich, West, McDonnell, Haley, Ayotte, and a host of other Tea Party republicans who are actually holding or have held elective office.

Romney didn’t campaign to have his political enemies run the show.

They may have been his primary opponents, but I hardly think as strategic-thinking and savvy a business alliance builder as he is, he sees only "enemies" --- as a host of posters around here have made of the opposing candidates who were not their first favorites. I think he sees allies.

I think he's looking at a lot of scrappy fighting allies in the battle for this fall's elections. And he'll need every one of them. And if he's as smart as he's shown himself to be in alot of ways on a lot of things, he will employ their skills in the larger effort of winning.

Depressed losers is what we have to make the DNC.

I think there's too many on this board too willing to give up -- and Obama's minions just laugh for what ineffective fools they've made of their opposition without having to even try or even spend a dime to make it happen.

FReegards!


63 posted on 04/16/2012 11:07:04 AM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson