Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

I think you guys are missing something. It sounds to me like the whole article is talking about a breakthrough in combining CO2 and hydrogen, into methane. Thus its not a perpetual motion machine. The hydrogen will be supplied outside of this process. That is the only thing that make sense to me.


24 posted on 04/11/2012 9:12:14 AM PDT by BJ1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BJ1

“The hydrogen will be supplied outside of this process”

Of course hydrogen can be supplied at a cheap price. /s


27 posted on 04/11/2012 9:21:10 AM PDT by Okieshooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: BJ1

As for the Hydrogen, you would likely get it from water, but you need energy to separate it. You could get it from H2S, which is interesting because its a byproduct of hydrocarbon refining.

Either way, you have to add energy here to get the hydrogen. Question is whether you could generate enough using solar to make it work at scale.

The earth is producing all kinds of DC power everyday, just by having its metal core turning within the magnetosphere - 186,000 lightening strikes a day.

I saw a video of a refueling tanker manifesting ‘St. Elmo’s Fire’ and the fuel nozzle arc’ing and sparking against the jet its trying to refuel.

Consider they are likely using JP-4, which is pretty flammable and not JP-5, which you could use to put out a cigarette.

Lot’s of free electrical energy out there. It’s just a matter of putting lightning in a bottle, as it were.


44 posted on 04/11/2012 10:08:05 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson