Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) Proceeding with a third party
Cato in PA

Posted on 04/10/2012 4:52:33 PM PDT by Cato in PA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: Rome2000

I figure Mitt isn’t much of a Mormon. He only has one wife.

By contrast, Newt is much better, working on number three.

President is a management job. Chuck doesn’t have much experience with that. Neither does Newt (though he gets half a point for herding cats in the House). Neither does Ron Paul.

Of course if we want someone to do triage on the country, Dr. Ron Paul is your guy.


61 posted on 04/10/2012 6:03:51 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

A third party is a total waste. Just look how the Libertarians do...who the heck will they run when Ronny Paul is gone?

Mitty is a total RINO piece of crap but it is what it is...I expect he will win and then WE THE PEOPLE will have to excersize our power and stay on top of him to stay right. OMG, if Allen West gets picked for Veep we have a winner!!


62 posted on 04/10/2012 6:08:45 PM PDT by GRRRRR (He'll NEVER be my President, FUBO! Treason is the Reason! Impeach the Kenyan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

I’ll make a deal with you and everyone else here who thinks I’m wrong: show me how we can bring Willard Romney the open socialist in line with conservatism to any degree and I’ll reluctantly support him.

I’m not some unreasonable idealist; I said it wasn’t about purity from the start and I meant it. Hell, if Romney would stop defending Romneycare and adopt a flat tax plan like Newt’s, that would be enough for me to vote for him because that, at least, would make some significant headway into fixing the economy.

It’s the same rationale behind my support for Newt: he’s come out against the individual mandate and has a good plan for the economy.


63 posted on 04/10/2012 6:10:08 PM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: GRRRRR; donmeaker

Care to take me up on my offer?

“I’ll make a deal with you and everyone else here who thinks I’m wrong: show me how we can bring Willard Romney the open socialist in line with conservatism to any degree and I’ll reluctantly support him.

I’m not some unreasonable idealist; I said it wasn’t about purity from the start and I meant it. Hell, if Romney would stop defending Romneycare and adopt a flat tax plan like Newt’s, that would be enough for me to vote for him because that, at least, would make some significant headway into fixing the economy.”


64 posted on 04/10/2012 6:20:03 PM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Every time I see that mug, I’m reminded of 9-11.


65 posted on 04/10/2012 6:28:15 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
If you think the point is when the Whig Party went under, you obviously have a reading comprehension problem. The issue is whether a path to victory exists for the Tea Party if it splits away from the GOPe, the way the Republican party split off from the Whigs. The answer is yes. It is just a nice irony that the Republicans would go the way of the Whigs in the process.

Almost every person in the history of the world who set out to achieve great things had some bozo in his ear telling him it couldn't be done. You are that bozo, telling all that there is no alternative to the socialist-Lite (tm) party for a conservative. There is, but it takes vision to recognize that, and it will take serendipity and a great person or persons to bring it about.

66 posted on 04/10/2012 6:30:25 PM PDT by Defiant (If there are infinite parallel universes, why Lord, am I living in the one with Obama as President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: GRRRRR

The libertarians fail because no one likes what they believe. Not the whole package, anyway.


67 posted on 04/10/2012 6:32:25 PM PDT by Defiant (If there are infinite parallel universes, why Lord, am I living in the one with Obama as President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

I don’t think Romney is an open socialist.

Romney care was a state requirement to buy insurance, in response to a federal requirement for Emergency Rooms to treat anyone who walks in. What were the alternatives?

1. let ER go bankrupt.
2. put ER workers in jail for violation of federal law.
3. enslave ER workers, forcing them to work on people who can’t pay.
4. steal from people with insurance, making them pay for people without.
5. fine people without insurance, and fine them enough to cover the ER costs they run up.
6. fine the people without insurance, but not enough to cover the ER costs- subsidize with other tax money.
7. invent a government program to pay for all health care.

Of those options, 5 sounds the most conservative to me, and it is the best description of Romney care. 6 is the Obamacare option, forced after 7 didn’t fly.


68 posted on 04/10/2012 6:33:51 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

The Republican party didn’t break off from the Whigs. The Whigs failed, and the Anti-Nebraska party was built up from its ruins, with a number of anti-slavery Democrats.

Why not do that again? Because there was a lot of bad that happened between the failure of the Whig party and the election of Lincoln and the Republicans. We would save our nation that pain.

“Lord, send us the cure. The sickness we have already.”


69 posted on 04/10/2012 6:37:07 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

Newt is your 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Party Candidate!

Wake the # up, people!

Go Newt!


70 posted on 04/10/2012 6:39:31 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

Here is a technique:

Vote for Mitt. He gets elected.
Vote for (R) for Representatives. A majority get elected.
Vote for (R) for Senator. A 60% majority get elected.

Then we can put through legislation that is all (R) and the liberal wing of the party will have to cater to the most conservative wing of the (R) party.

That is essentially what happened in 2008, except with a (D) instead of a (R) and the liberals/socialists rather than with the conservatives.

Imagine: doing away with the EPA. How about the DEd. Perhaps even cutting back on the regulations from HUD that prevent cities from adjusting to modern conditions. Throw in a conservative supreme court justice or two, but one as stellar as Thomas is unlikely.


71 posted on 04/10/2012 6:47:47 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

I read your posts. Many false extrapilations.


72 posted on 04/10/2012 6:49:46 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Freepers!
All in favor of surrendering your right to bear arms
Raise Both.
All in favor of Free Republic, click here.
or mail checks to:

Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794



73 posted on 04/10/2012 6:50:42 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

If we threaten to withhold support from Romney but don’t rule out voting for him in the general, it will give us leverage over him and the party.


74 posted on 04/10/2012 6:51:51 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A liberal's compassion is limited to the size of other peoples' paychecks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

I disagree that President is a management job. It is a vision job. There is so much machinery in place, the only “management” needed is picking a handful of folks who share you, um, VISION.

Mitt has no vision.


75 posted on 04/10/2012 6:52:45 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

Any chance Sarah Palin could jump late into the primaries and take enough delegates to keep Romney from his expected coronation?

We have certainly reached the point of desperation.

A brokered convention sounds better all the time ... and it sounds MUCH better if Sarah has a shot at the crown!


76 posted on 04/10/2012 7:01:32 PM PDT by DNME (Paging SARAH PALIN! Please pick up any white courtesy phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

some of us put our energy into the primary fight. If we cannot dominate these low turnout events (IA = 120k, NH = 220k, etc.), winning an election with 100 million voters ... ???

That is why a bunch of us were doing the stuff, phones, windshield flyers, door-to-door, signs, etc. in the December of New Hampshire and the caucuses of Maine .... cause that is where the grassroots can matter.

I spent my wad already. Who’s well rested for a 3rd-party pipe dream.

GO NEWT. CT-RI-PA-DE-NY in 2 WEEKS.


77 posted on 04/10/2012 7:08:02 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (and we are still campaigning against MITT in CT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry; Jim Robinson

Does that mean Jim Robinson is a “plant” since he doesn’t support Romney? ( Jim...copied you on this since I mentioned your name)

So in your world are you an Obama “plant” if you don’t enthusiastically agree to support the father of socialized medicine in America?

Does that mean you are a “plant” if you don’t like Romney’s support of Planned Parenthood, gun control, global warming, forcing Catholic hospitals to provide contraception, higher taxes, liberal judges, wealth redistribution?

If so...I guess I’m a plant.

FUMR!


78 posted on 04/10/2012 7:15:35 PM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cato in PA

I’d rather have a liberal than a traitor in office.

But Romney’s going to lose anyway.


79 posted on 04/10/2012 7:15:50 PM PDT by WPaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vmivol00

the guy in the office with me said:
people who live in PA, 2 weeks before the PA primary, and they are online discussing the general election and who they are going to run for Pres in Nebraska and TN and SD ....

he said, “people like dat are not really involved in politics.”


80 posted on 04/10/2012 7:19:39 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (and we are still campaigning against MITT in CT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson