Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Well, rush, here is a lesson I have learned in life. I have learned it the hard way. Here it is (and it applies everywhere to everyone...

I do not even listen to what people have to say. I look at what they do. In the case of “professional politicans”, I look at what they did in office.

mcromney is a socialist. Period.

Santorum is a big government socialist. Period.

I can tolerate pulling the lever for newt, but in no way will I ever consider putting my name along side a socialist. Period.

Socialist is as socialist does. If rush believes a socialist, well, connect the dots. There are only 2 outcomes. Either he is a republican first, or has been bamboozled by mcromney. I doubt he has been bamboozled.

You have to make a decision, make a stand. The question is simple, do you stand with and for socialism, or not?

If you stand for, or are willing to lend your name to, socialism, then get the friggin hell off of this forum, because you do not belong here.

Our founding fathers were forced to make a stand. It was not a popular stand ( 30% liked the king, 30% did not care either way, 30% wanted independence, with 10% just not giving a damn ). The 30%, with nothing but the convictions they held, and a determination that has not been seen since, won the day. They were not popular, nor did they have the blessings of the majority. They just did what they had to do.

It is our turn. Will you stand, mocked by others, openly critisized by others, and left unwanted by others, in order to save this country from ruin?

Or will you take the easy way out, and vote for the lesser of two evils, or the least socialist socialist?

I, for one, will stand against socialism, tyranny, and big government intervention, regardless of the letter folowing the candidates name.

My vote is not a wasted vote. My vote is an all out attack on those that wish to impose a system of socialism on me and my family. It is the last resort, and i will not go quietly into the night, knowing that my vote could, possibly have changed the political scene from socialist/socialist lite choices to a real choice.

That is what a revolution is. That is how you do it. And I stand ready to be ridiculed, mocked, and cast out into the political wasteland if need be. I will not lend my name to the destruction of this country. I owe this to my children.

If I need to stand alone on the hilltop, so be it. My tagline says it all.


10 posted on 04/10/2012 2:55:26 PM PDT by joe fonebone (If you vote for the lesser of two evils, you are still voting for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: joe fonebone

Congrats on ensuring Romney’s nomination. Appreciate it.


15 posted on 04/10/2012 3:12:05 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: joe fonebone; lula

I’m with you joe, 100%.

This is not a game - the lives of our children and theirs are at stake. We must use what God gave us to discern and act accordingly.

Pray for the U.S.A. to return to God.


16 posted on 04/10/2012 3:15:08 PM PDT by plsjr (<>< ... HIS will be done! (http://NewSpring.cc/webservice - Biblical Nourishment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: joe fonebone

Excellent post!

BUMP.


32 posted on 04/10/2012 4:08:25 PM PDT by upchuck (Need is not an acceptable lifestyle choice; dependent is not a career. ~ Dr. Tim Nerenz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: joe fonebone
I do not even listen to what people have to say. I look at what they do. In the case of “professional politicans”, I look at what they did in office.

Thank you for saying that. It just happens to be the ONLY correct way to choose which candidate to vote for in any race.

Look, don't listen.

You'd think that would be indelibly inscribed on every Freeper's conscience by now.

35 posted on 04/10/2012 4:20:07 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: joe fonebone
Oh to be sure, you will not be standing alone. You might be on the hilltop alone, but you won't be alone in not voting for Romney.

Me, I will more than likely be playing golf. Can't do any worse there than throwing away my vote for the GOPE candidate.

47 posted on 04/10/2012 5:39:18 PM PDT by ImpBill ("America, where are you now?" - Little "r" republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: joe fonebone

Your post needs to be read by every breathin ass on this forum.You sir, are right on.


56 posted on 04/10/2012 8:51:20 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: joe fonebone

>> Santorum is a big government socialist. Period.

Yes, and just a shade that is pleasing to many on the “Right”.

Go Newt!!!


57 posted on 04/10/2012 8:52:35 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: joe fonebone

Way to build coalition, there.
Remember the compromises the founding fathers made on slavery? Over and over?


69 posted on 04/12/2012 3:10:46 AM PDT by hocndoc (WingRight.org: Have mustard seed & I'm not afraid to use it. 2 men inherited a Bush economy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: joe fonebone
While I disagree with you on Santorum, I agree with you on Romney.
A Primary election is still a "Primary" and should be treated as such.
As long as there is another choice, other than "TROJAN HORSE" Romney, I'll support the other choice.
That choice now is Newt.
If we nominate Romney, Romney will lose.

On another thread, WhiskeyX's analysis is very good on
If we nominate Romney, Romney will lose, intentionally!


Read this article.


The only way Conservatives will lose to the Kenyan Turd is IF the "Establishment Republicans" REFUSE to support the Republican Nominee.
Now the "Republican Establishment's" hatred for conservatives is well known.
Jon Bershad wrote about Rush's analysis of their PANIC.


How many times has the "Republican Establishment" treated us to one lecture after the other on the need for “compromise” and “patience.”?
After we elect and RE-elect the "Republican Establishment", they conduct themselves with none of the confidence and enthusiasm with which they expressed themselves on the campaign trail.
It may be worth it for the GOP to lose some elections - if it means that conservatives—and the country—will ultimately win.

If we didn’t know it before, WE ... the Tea Partiers, now knows that accepting short-term loss in exchange for long-term gain is the essence of compromise, the essence of politics.

Ironically, we can thank the "Republican Establishment" for impressing this so indelibly upon us!!!
I'm fresh out of "patience", and I'm not in the mood for "compromise".
"COMPROMISE" to me is a dirty word.
Let the RINO's compromise their values, with the conservatives, for a change.

My dislike for the Democratic Party is second to none.
But my ... LOATHING ... for the "Establishment Republicans" ... is even stronger!
The "Establishment Republicans" can go to hell!

Right now, I'm supporting Newt!
72 posted on 04/12/2012 4:34:29 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson