Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tenacious 1

Internals showed him losing PA... that would end without quesiton his political career.. he quit. He served his purpose to stop gingrich and ensure Romney..

Once a jackass always a jackass.. par for the course for Santorum. How badly does an electorate have to send a guy packing for folks who don’t live in his district to comprehend hes been rejected for good reason?

Sigh.. thanks for Romney folks.


107 posted on 04/10/2012 12:29:31 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: HamiltonJay
He served his purpose to stop gingrich and ensure Romney.

Yep. He still has to pay the piper for his lies about Newt. And the damage to our country that has occurred because of it. I wouldn't want to be in his shoes/family. What you sow you reap - he should know that but his glory was more important than the Glory of God. Mitt's cult allows him to lie, he has no moral worth at all.

154 posted on 04/10/2012 3:22:45 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: HamiltonJay

I didn’t like Santorum (I thought he was a self-serving hypocrite) but I doubt that he would have been the candidate anyway. He got the votes of the social conservatives after he emerged as the Elmer Gantry...er, I mean, godly man...for that group. But he was as big government and opportunistic as either Romney or Obama, and a simple look at his past which the good people of PA knew abundantly will prove that.

However, the Southern/Midwestern socons voted for Huckabee in the last election’s primaries, and they kept Santorum going by voting for him in this one. But as a group they have never elected anybody in their lives, with the possible exception of Carter. I remember when all the churches in my area - I was living in Ohio at that time - were praising the Lord for the election of this “godly” man. That lasted about six months because he was so inept.

Social conservatism is essential, but it’s got to be coupled with knowledge of other spheres (economics, international politics, the law and the Constitution) in order to produce a credible candidate with any extension beyond your local congregation.

Maybe now that Santorum is gone, Gingrich (the only true fiscal, legal and social conservative) will be able to take on Romney and Obama. The press has been ignoring him because he makes a good impression when people see him, but I don’t think they’ll be able to do that now.

Who are they going to focus on, Ron Paul???


160 posted on 04/10/2012 4:07:57 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson