Skip to comments.
Nude maid service may be against the law
KCBD News Channel 11 ^
| 9 April 2012
| Christie Post
Posted on 04/09/2012 2:18:53 PM PDT by Army Air Corps
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-122 next last
To: Army Air Corps
Re:
Nude maid service may be against the law Gadzooks! Now... you tell me!
101
posted on
04/09/2012 5:43:07 PM PDT
by
Bender2
("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
To: moovova
That was quite a puckish comment....
102
posted on
04/09/2012 7:10:38 PM PDT
by
P.O.E.
(Pray for America)
To: Army Air Corps
After having looked at her company website (for purely educational purposes of course) I think they would be doing the sighted world a huge favor by putting her out of business... no one should be subjected to seeing any of her staff naked.
103
posted on
04/09/2012 7:15:15 PM PDT
by
battousai
(Conservatives are racist? YES, I hate stupid white liberals.)
To: battousai
Members of the Milkbone Brigade, eh?
104
posted on
04/09/2012 7:18:00 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: TYVets
you mean become even more base, more immoral....
yes...maybe soon we can have nude boys running around cutting the lawns for all the perverts out there...
boys being 18 yrs or so....could be your son or grandson...I'm sure they'll start looking for workers soon....
105
posted on
04/09/2012 7:50:50 PM PDT
by
cherry
To: TYVets
you mean become even more base, more immoral....
yes...maybe soon we can have nude boys running around cutting the lawns for all the perverts out there...
boys being 18 yrs or so....could be your son or grandson...I'm sure they'll start looking for workers soon....
106
posted on
04/09/2012 7:51:04 PM PDT
by
cherry
To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Yeah, seriously. I imagine there are a number of freepers. As for what could go wrong, lots.
107
posted on
04/10/2012 1:40:31 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
("In this election year of 12, how deep into their closets will we delve?")
To: Army Air Corps
I didn’t say repulsed, lol. Looking at your thingie does not do the same for us as when you look at “ours”.
108
posted on
04/10/2012 3:15:39 AM PDT
by
NoGrayZone
(Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
To: stuartcr
-—Yeah, seriously. I imagine there are a number of freepers. As for what could go wrong, lots.-—
Wrong? You sound like one of those prudes.
To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
110
posted on
04/10/2012 4:50:24 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
("In this election year of 12, how deep into their closets will we delve?")
To: mnehring
There is also no “decontamination” procedure for Mrsa. Probably a third of the general population is colonized with it. Likely greater than 75% of my colleagues (working in a hospital) are colonized. What drama!!!
111
posted on
04/10/2012 5:01:38 AM PDT
by
Mom MD
(The country needs Obamacare like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask)
To: stuartcr
I find a moralizer who criticizes people for moralizing to be a bit hypocritical.
To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
What did I say that you consider criticizing? Please provide a quote.
113
posted on
04/10/2012 5:09:39 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
("In this election year of 12, how deep into their closets will we delve?")
To: stuartcr
——I imagine there are a number of freepers that could tell you, and also why it is morally reprehensible, demon-spawned and just another reason why the US is cursed and will fail. Oh yeah, and shes a liberal.-—
To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Why do you consider that to be criticizing?
115
posted on
04/10/2012 5:32:08 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
("In this election year of 12, how deep into their closets will we delve?")
To: stuartcr
Perhaps you could explain your own statement, since only you know what’s going on in your head.
To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
I thought you knew, otherwise why would you say what you did?
I find those that make comments like yours, to be petty and without substance.
‘nite for now. I’ll be back tomorrow to check on your next comment.
117
posted on
04/10/2012 5:58:35 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
("In this election year of 12, how deep into their closets will we delve?")
To: stuartcr
-—I thought you knew, otherwise why would you say what you did?-—
If I misinterpreted your statement, why are you dodging an explanation of your statement?
I look forward to another red herring.
To: NoGrayZone
Quite a general statement. You are aware that there are women who are actually aroused by one’s gentleman vegetables?
119
posted on
04/10/2012 6:35:57 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: NoGrayZone
Well, you noted that the reaction of all women to the sight of wedding tackle is, “Eeeeewww!” That is not a reaction of indifference, but active revulsion. “Eeeewww!” is what one often exclaims when seeing fresh roadkill or when one sees Rosie O'Donnell in the middle of a feeding frenzy.
120
posted on
04/10/2012 7:13:17 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson