I don’t think I missed the point at all.
Until this decision the court decided whether a person belonged to a court-recognized religion that the court decided was sufficiently opposed to paying union dues.
That should all be irrelevant.
If my faith is called the Church of Sherman, and it believes union dues are satanic, I have every right to refuse to pay them. Even if I’m the only member of the religion.
Before the decision, the court decided whether a religion was to be recognized as valid in this sense. A court has no valid reason to be making such decisions.
You talked about practicing your faith of one and made no reference to union dues. That is why I made the comment I made.