Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/04/2012 9:35:35 PM PDT by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: U-238
Heck, I want a nuclear drone that can fly for months. Why shouldn't the gooberment?

/johnny

2 posted on 04/04/2012 9:39:51 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: U-238
The U.S. actually considered building nuclear powered long range strategic bombers in the 1950s. The NB-36 was converted to carry a fully operational nuclear power plant as proof-of-concept, but it did not power the aircraft. The NB-36 cockpit was heavily shielded from the radiation and the crew was sealed inside with a 3-ton plug. If the NB-36 went down, the crew was along for the ride.

When the NB-36 flew, there was a C-119 chase plane with a group of fully armed paratroops. Should the NB-36 crash, they were to jump at the crash site to secure the nuclear material until authorities and decontamination teams arrived.

What killed the nuclear bomber was the stark fact that a crash would spread radioactive materials over a large area and require tons of remedial work. The nuclear bomber was canceled. The same thing applies to a nuclear powered drone.

5 posted on 04/04/2012 10:37:05 PM PDT by MasterGunner01 (11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: U-238

Obama has them working on an algae powered drone that can stay up for minutes at a time.


7 posted on 04/04/2012 10:52:54 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Anybody but Obama- because it's not always about me™. Now its about my nation and not my chastity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: U-238

Yep.


9 posted on 04/04/2012 11:28:18 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: U-238
>"Then add to that the problem of all that technology falling into the wrong hands, and it was decided that the risks were simply too high. "

Hard for that NOT TO HAPPEN, with a moose slime marxist mole in the CIC seat!

11 posted on 04/05/2012 12:26:30 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: U-238

Shoot,they should talk to the guy, wait a miute, he crashed and burned in New Mexico a while back. Anyway, he was talking about a plane that had solar power for the daytime and glide at night years ago.


12 posted on 04/05/2012 3:11:24 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: U-238
Actually, this is a perfect application for solar panels.

Up above the cloud ceiling you would have sunshine 12 hours a day.

Solar-powered drones could be used as alternatives to communications satellites, for one thing. A lot cheaper to launch, and you could rotate them out every couple of years for routine maintenance and upgrades.

It would probably look something like this:


13 posted on 04/05/2012 7:35:36 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Over half of U.S. murders are of black people, and 90% of them are committed by other black people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: U-238
but the consequences of a nuclear drone crash was just too much of a political risk to take. If a nuke drone crashed over enemy territory, that country would undoubtedly claim that the U.S. had exploded a dirty bomb over their state.

A foreign country? How about one of those drones crashing here near a US city. The political "fallout" would be enormous. Sorry, had to say it.

It is too much of a liability though. Look at the fuss raised over nuclear reactors in spacecraft.
17 posted on 04/20/2012 6:05:26 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson