I knew you’d bring up freedom of religion, as though I’m somehow preventing Romney from his religion of choice, or as if I have to approve of it. You know better, I’m sure, but I figured you’d try, anyway.
Like I said, you don’t get it. You know ZIP about Mormonism and the Mormon church’s view of Romney’s role in their prophecies. You can have your abortion-loving, homosexual-pandering, Planned Parenthood supporting, tax raising cult member. Tell me-—does it bother you at ALL that he has held such liberal positions?
I am sorry, KevinDavis- but a mormon will not get elected president. Neither would a muslim, nor a buddhist, nor an aethist. Because in the end, we are a christian nation, with a christian people- and we won’t be electing people whom cannot turn to God in the hours of crisis.
Freedom of Religion is for the government, not the people, to be blind to a person’s religion. There is nothing in the constitution that requires that I turn a blind eye to my faith and vote for someone despite their religion.
It would seem to me that the republican party is making a mistake turning a blind eye to the fact that Romney can’t win primaries in the traditional republican states.