[KevinDavis]

You might as well put me on alert.. I support Mitt over St Rick.. The guy who lost his Senate seat in 06 by 18 points..

[CatherineofAragon]

“Go, Mitt, Go”, huh?

So you support an abortion-loving, homosexual-pandering liberal cult member. You should be proud of yourself. /s

[AmericanInTokyo]

Well, at least you have the decent courage to be open about it and admit to your foolish RINO-supporting political thinking. I admire your straightforward honesty about supporting Bishop Romney. Hats off in an odd sort of way.

Its these people posing as only anti Santorum, or pro-Newt, but really are for Romney and have been since day one, but could not do so openly (dont ask, dont tell) because they knew the stated philosophy and moral underpinnings of Free Republic from the get-go with respect to MITT ROMNEY.

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

Santorum will lose PA by about at leas 5 and New York will go to Romney by over 55%. And looking at the theory that if Newt drops out, Santorum will run away with it just did not hold water.

After April and because there are so many WTA and closed primaries that will favor Romney, the momentum will be enough for the win. It is not looking like an open convention after all.

But we will still see more of Newt, he will be a big part of the convention, and I also believe he will be a part of the new administration after we beat Obama.

[LovedSinner]

And so you support Romney who lost by only 17% points when he ran for the Senate in 1994. By the way, Rick lost in a terrible year for Republicans (2006), when the GOP lost both the House and the Senate, while Romney lost in 1994, when the GOP flipped both houses of Congress. Good job Romney!! By the way, Santorum beat an incumbent Democrat in 1994 while Mitt was running to the left of Ted Kennedy and getting killed. But we need to vote for Romney over "St Rick" because Romney is so much more electable, right?