Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diogenesis

I think they believed they could effectively deal with it without the media sideshow that would have resulted from her recusal.


20 posted on 03/30/2012 6:46:56 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: PetroniusMaximus
An alternate hypothesis is that they are corrupt to the core.

They ex parte met with, and bowed before,
an undocumented, if not foreign, litigant
on a case before them, HERE:

.



24 posted on 03/30/2012 6:56:28 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: PetroniusMaximus; mickie; flaglady47
Ruth Buzzi Bader-Meinhof (look it up) Ginsburg is the only one that can recuse herself.

It's my opinion that the conservative justices know they have Kennedy's vote....and choose not to challenge Ginsburg on ethical grounds at this time. Why argue with success?

Approaching 80, Bader-Meinhof is the oldest Justice on the Court. She's undergone surgery for pancreatic surgery and probably will resign after the November election, so why give her the personal pleasure of recusal publicity if they don't have to. She's best ignored as the inept nebbish she is.

(Gee, I hope I'm correct on my assessment that the votes are in the bag, shudder, shudder. But I'd lay book that they are).

Leni

29 posted on 03/30/2012 7:09:46 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson