Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

TREASON, IMHO, by this lousy president...
1 posted on 03/27/2012 2:04:40 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Ron C.

who is going to put him on trial? no one. that is why he is getting away with anything and everything no one has a spine to stand up for what is or used to be correct.


2 posted on 03/27/2012 2:06:38 PM PDT by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

FReepers - is this not reason to try the man for endangering our personal and national security?


3 posted on 03/27/2012 2:08:48 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Attn Freepers:

I refuse to watch the state-run, liberal-left, lame-stream, progressive-communist media. However, I would appreciate if a Freeper who does indulge in Major Network News, to advise me of exactly how the state-run media is reporting this story. Are they spinning it, as usual? Or have they chose to totally ignore the story and its impact on America?


4 posted on 03/27/2012 2:09:15 PM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

That he will tell foreigners,,,”ill do exactly what you want. You already won the negotiations, so you won’t need to give me anything in return. I’ll dance like a monkey on a stick for you. All i need, is for you to let me wait until after i no longer need to answer to the people i am SUPPOSED to represent.”

That about right?


5 posted on 03/27/2012 2:10:16 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for officeoffi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

agree, open mic was blessing. NoObama


8 posted on 03/27/2012 2:12:48 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
Newt has been trying to get this out in the media though they will not cover it. It is like no one cares what Obama does anymore.
10 posted on 03/27/2012 2:21:46 PM PDT by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
This is what the mic caught. Makes you wonder what he promised his Saudi king when he bowed down to him. Really makes you wonder that in private he did not promise the Izzlumics that he would hand them America on a silver platter, just continue to back him. That is my bet if I were a betting man. I firmly believe he has one goal, and only ONE GOAL, that is the destruction of this Republic, any way, any how he can. But to do as much damage as possible, so that no one care repair it.
14 posted on 03/27/2012 2:25:14 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (I'm no Dim or RINO. I am a Monarchist. I serve THE coming King of kings!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

I wonder if he’s going to try and bypass the Supreme Court if they strike down his health insurance scam.

Can he impose this monstrosity by executive order?


15 posted on 03/27/2012 2:27:38 PM PDT by Deo volente (God willing, America will survive this Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

If there’s really 40% out there who approve of this treasonous pig-with-blue-lipstick....then is there really a country remaining to betray?


20 posted on 03/27/2012 2:32:32 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
More to ponder when conservatives have to choose if to sit out the election, or hold their noses in November.
21 posted on 03/27/2012 2:32:41 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
President Obama told Russian President Medvedev that “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.”

Just WOW! It's hard for Obama to laugh this off and spin it away - would make a great ad for the Republican nominee.

Telling anyone this sort of thing is saying "in the end, you will win"! America will lose.

32 posted on 03/27/2012 2:54:55 PM PDT by unique1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Crickets chirping.......


33 posted on 03/27/2012 2:55:03 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

I imagine that Putin knows more about who Obama is than most Americans. Because little Barry grew up among Communists and KGB agents, and probably continued to keep his connections with them.


34 posted on 03/27/2012 2:57:53 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Admit it, it takes the MSM to stir things up before Congress takes action. Richard Nixon would still be with us if not for the determination of the Graham cracker woman (the owner of the WashPost at the time) to oust him.


39 posted on 03/27/2012 3:12:32 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.; TitansAFC; onyx; LuvFreeRepublic; Sea Parrot; SweetCaroline; matthew fuller; Gator113; ...

“In order to please Russia, President Obama will use a second term to weaken further the peaceful, purely defensive systems that can defend the U.S. and our allies from missile attacks.”

http://www.newt.org/2012/03/27/newt-gingrich-statement-on-obamas-flexibility-in-defending-america-and-her-allies/

Newt Gingrich Statement on Obama’s “Flexibility” In Defending America and Her Allies
March 27, 2012

The President’s remark to his Russian counterpart that he would have more “flexibility” on ballistic missile defense after the election underscores how dangerous an Obama re-election would be. The President promised the Senate during the ratification debate on the New START Treaty he would not compromise on the Russian demand to limit US ballistic missile defense. Now we find out that promise was nothing more than empty words. The Russian demands, including ballistic missile deployment restrictions, limits on the technological capabilities of our missiles, and joint control over launch decisions, if agreed to by the US government; constitute a clear-and-present danger to American security.

Background: The Russians are seeking the following:

A legally binding agreement to limit future US ballistic missile defense;

The Russians seek to impose deployment restrictions on US sea-based ballistic missile defense systems including the deployment of Aegis-class missile defense ships from the Black Sea – the path over which Iranian ICBMs would have to travel to reach the US;

The Russians seek joint control of a decision to launch ballistic missile defense interceptors – effectively “outsourcing” life-or-death” decisions about American security to the Kremlin;

Restrictions on the capability of US defensive missiles to prevent them from being able to shoot down ICBMs. This would be implemented by imposing performance limitations on US interceptors – the velocity (at burnout, Vbo) may not exceed 4-km/sec.

This figure reinstates the limitation derived from the now defunct ABM Treaty of 1972. The Obama administration would use these agreements with Russia to effectively recreate the constraints of the ABM Treaty.


42 posted on 03/27/2012 3:32:35 PM PDT by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
... more faith in our adversaries, more betrayal of our traditional allies and more unilateral indulgence in nuclear abolition fantasies.

The MSM - liberals - and the New York Times will be in there helping him get elected:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBFOmUXR080

43 posted on 03/27/2012 3:41:58 PM PDT by GOPJ (Democrat-Media Complex - buried stories and distorted facts... freeper 'andrew' Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

It reveals why must fear an Obama 2nd term .

Even more than a Mitt first term.


45 posted on 03/27/2012 3:48:58 PM PDT by KSanders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReepers

46 posted on 03/27/2012 3:50:01 PM PDT by tomkat ( FU obama !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

To quote Vice President BiteMe.......”This is a big f***ing deal”.


62 posted on 03/27/2012 4:46:57 PM PDT by Churchillspirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Obama said what we already know. He has nothing to lose in his second term. If he has a DemocRAT Congress, we’re screwed.


67 posted on 03/27/2012 5:43:05 PM PDT by Pinkbell (Rick Santorum For President (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N89LGhm-Ztc))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson