Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

All right, now I’m confused (more than usual, that is). Why all the emphasis on a pipeline(s) from Cushing to Houston?? How does the oil GET TO Cushing?? I thought the big deal in not “doing” the Keystone was that it crossed “precious aquifers” which a pipeline leak might contaminate.


3 posted on 03/27/2012 9:03:51 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
The Enbridge/Enterprise pipeline will follow an existing route, bypassing the Nebraska aquifer recharge area.

Existing pipelines will have to move crude from Alberta to the tie-in.

5 posted on 03/27/2012 9:11:25 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Wonder Warthog
Besides Canada, Cushing is seeing significant oil increases from North Dakota and West Texas. Crude oil is shown below in green.

I thought the big deal in not “doing” the Keystone was that it crossed “precious aquifers” which a pipeline leak might contaminate.

That is a red herring thrown out to people who won't look at a map.


8 posted on 03/27/2012 9:24:57 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson