Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog
Existing Enbridge Pipelines While that is just a list, there already are pipelines which bring Tar Sands crude to the US. Bakken oil (ND, MT) gets delivered in those, too, but the problem is one of capacity, and has been since we began Bakken oil projects in 2000 over in Montana's Elm Coulee Field.

With North Dakota's substantial contribution (now ranked third in monthly production), the pipelines just can't carry enough oil, so there are unit trains and even haul trucks moving crude oil.

The 'discount' spoken of means oil production companies are getting paid as much as $30 less than spot for the oil (usually at par with WTI) at the wellhead because of transportation costs/issues.

Expanding the pipeline capacity by running additional lines alongside the existing ones does two things: Increases capacity, and dodges the EPA bullet by utilizing routes which have already been approved. Those lines will be north of Cushing, OK.

17 posted on 03/27/2012 1:19:57 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe
"Expanding the pipeline capacity by running additional lines alongside the existing ones does two things: Increases capacity, and dodges the EPA bullet by utilizing routes which have already been approved. Those lines will be north of Cushing, OK."

Which is the missing key datum. Parallel pipelines NORTH of Cushing make sense in avoiding the "environmental evil excuse" that the Obama socialists are using to stall things.

Now I wonder what "new" excuse they will come up with.

18 posted on 03/27/2012 2:12:08 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson