Not familiar with this term. Much more familiar with the term that means "SUBMISSION."
But how could that be an issue?
“Do yo have evidence that this person has been less than qualified and compromised due to their conversion to Mohammedanism? “
9/11 is all the evidence I need.
The gist is that if this is true, we have a(nother) traitor in high places.
Islam is not a religion. It is a political ideology masquerading as a religion which has vowed to overcome Western culture by any means necessary.
Ergo, if true, this man holds a view that could at any moment call him to abandon any allegiance to America and express in the most violent way possible, his allegiance to Islam.
Have you not seen this?
yes this is a wacky situation and this Muslim convert looks wacky. A hundred men could do his job just as well and without them being Muslim
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Why? Oh, just a gut feeling I have... and the text of the Koran.
Do your “feel” that this person is unable to carry out their assigned missions?
If the person is a Muslim, yes.
Do you think that somehow their mission results have been less than required due to his chosen faith?
If the person is a Muslim, yes.
Do yo have evidence that this person has been less than qualified and compromised due to their conversion to Mohammedanism?
The “evidence” is a big hole at the south end of Manhattan Island, along with thousands of other acts of terrorism perpetrated in the name of muhammed.
If they are Islamic, whether “converted” or not, they pose a clear and present danger to our way of life.
Just asking?
Indeed you were, and these are my answers.
I realize the opinion is only my own, and that yours may be different.
It will NOT change mine.