Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice

From Fox News website:

ON – The Supreme Court has unanimously sided with Idaho property owners whose plans to build a home were blocked by an Environmental Protection Agency order declaring the property contained wetlands.

In an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, the court says Wednesday that the EPA cannot threaten fines of more than $30,000 a day without giving property owners the ability to challenge its actions.

The decision is a victory for Mike and Chantell Sackett, whose property near a scenic lake has sat undisturbed since the EPA ordered a halt in work in 2007. The agency said part of the property was a wetlands that cannot be disturbed without a permit.

The couple complained there was no reasonable way to challenge the order.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/21/supreme-court-sides-with-idaho-property-owners-over-epa/#ixzz1plUWfCxh


7 posted on 03/21/2012 8:24:51 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (May Mitt Romney be the Paul Tsongas of 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Sivana

Rush will cover it.


12 posted on 03/21/2012 8:25:44 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Beware the Sweater Vest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Sivana

It was unanimous at the Supreme Court?

So even a wise Latina and the ACLU representative to the Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, agree that the EPA is out of control here.

Well, this is a smackdown to Obama isn’t it?


18 posted on 03/21/2012 8:27:16 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Sivana
The Supreme Court has unanimously sided with Idaho property owners

Wow! I wonder if Ginsburg is aware somebody wrote an opinion for her and voted against the EPA?

48 posted on 03/21/2012 8:49:29 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Democrats love direct democracy until it's time to vote on something. Then they scream for a judge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Sivana; StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; ...
From Fox News website:

ON – The Supreme Court has unanimously sided with Idaho property owners whose plans to build a home were blocked by an Environmental Protection Agency order declaring the property contained wetlands.

In an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, the court says Wednesday that the EPA cannot threaten fines of more than $30,000 a day without giving property owners the ability to challenge its actions.

The decision is a victory for Mike and Chantell Sackett, whose property near a scenic lake has sat undisturbed since the EPA ordered a halt in work in 2007. The agency said part of the property was a wetlands that cannot be disturbed without a permit.

The couple complained there was no reasonable way to challenge the order.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/21/supreme-court-sides-with-idaho-property-owners-over-epa/#ixzz1plUWfCxh

Thank you for the above information, Dr. Sivana (post #7)

Here's the SCOTUS opinion: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1062.pdf

50 posted on 03/21/2012 8:50:08 AM PDT by nutmeg (Rest in Peace, and THANK YOU, Andrew Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Sivana

“...the EPA cannot threaten fines of more than $30,000 a day without giving property owners the ability to challenge its actions.”

The EPA will just change to meet that guide from SCOTUS. $29,999.00 per day is still enough to break anyone.


75 posted on 03/21/2012 9:38:23 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson