Very interesting. However, according to the news reports, the gunman was wearing a chest mounted camera so he could record his atrocity.
If the videos show up on any of the Jihadi websites, we’ll know.
Of course, all the time they spent barking up the wrong tree gave the real killers plenty of time to get away and destroy evidence. Oh well...
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Islamists, neo nazis, the difference is only one of motivation.
A chest mounted camera - that’s certainly wierd, but not unlikely for a jihadi. Remember the Beheading School of Video Production that was so popular for a while...
The very first reports of the attack on the soldiers described the person as being “Muslim” in appearance, meaning, I assume, that he was darker skinned or perhaps what could be seen of him beneath his helmet looked North African. He was also described as being short, stocky and having a scar on his face or neck. Only political correctness could translate this into a tall, fit neo-Nazi ex-soldier with a tattoo.
The first attacks were on soldiers who were North African or African, and were probably meant as a warning to any Muslims who cooperated with the enemy, while the attack on the Jewish school was clearly the standard Muslim attack on the most defenseless people they could find in the ethnic group they hate the most.