Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cyber Liberty
Interesting. I wonder what exactly that bill said and why he voted against it.I’m guessing there must have been a rider on the bill that killed it for Jim.
19 posted on 03/20/2012 6:23:46 PM PDT by Palin_Rubio2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Palin_Rubio2012
I wonder what exactly that bill said and why he voted against it.

There was no "rider." He claimed he voted against it as a parliamentary maneuver so he could bring the bill back "later." Later never came, and his vote gave other Senators political cover to also vote "no." He should have allowed a Senator from a non-Coastal state do that, because in his case it made him look self-serving. Which he was/is/always will be.

23 posted on 03/20/2012 6:39:57 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty ("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson