To: Cyber Liberty
Interesting. I wonder what exactly that bill said and why he voted against it.I’m guessing there must have been a rider on the bill that killed it for Jim.
I wonder what exactly that bill said and why he voted against it.
There was no "rider." He claimed he voted against it as a parliamentary maneuver so he could bring the bill back "later." Later never came, and his vote gave other Senators political cover to also vote "no." He should have allowed a Senator from a non-Coastal state do that, because in his case it made him look self-serving. Which he was/is/always will be.
posted on 03/20/2012 6:39:57 PM PDT
by Cyber Liberty
("If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." --Winston Churchill)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson