This time, they may have mistakenly counted on what they believe to be a lack of intellectual depth in the "class" they identify as "women." Such a mistake unmasks the ignorance of a ruling "class" we can now call "progressive" pseudo-intellectuals.
By forcing this fight, they count on the younger generations they have propagandized in the schools and social media, on the screen, and in various other ways.
No doubt they are unaware of the millions of homes across America where private or home schooling has undercut their planning, and where intellectual curiosity and depth have allowed new generations to explore America's founding ideas, its Constitutional protections, and the real meaning of rights, in a much larger and more freeing context than the Obama/Reid/Pelosi interpretation allows.
With a little nudging from thought leaders, "progressives" may find that women also see themselves, and will express themselves, as guardians of liberty for future generations--real liberty, not the "license" government-mandated "goodies" encourage or grant.
Women are capable of distinguishing between the ideas of liberty and those of selfish, power-motivated vote seekers, who seize on a drug store product's cost as a 'hook' to get their votes, so that government can erode the protections and prohibitions of the First Amendment to the Constitution.
Not so fast!
Women are smarter than that, and GOP candidates need to exploit such blatant and insulting assaults on the intellectual ability and understanding of women!