How many times will fellow Freepers post items from Grover G. Norquist as though he is a reputable, reliable source?
Norquist is the enemy within.
Grover may understand economics, and that is fine.
However, he also is too cozy with the Islamic infiltrators into our culture.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/grover_norquists_jihad.html
http://frontpagemag.com/2010/02/25/cpac-shills-for-islamic-terrorists/
http://1389blog.com/category/politics/clinton/
It is akin to being a buddy with Adolph Hitler in 1933.
In my view, Lott was a fool to permit Norquist to hide behind his skirts in this fashion, thereby lending undeserved credibility to this cunning enabler of soft-jihad.
man_in_tx, my point to you is the same. You have a few malcontents who either have no quotes or few word quotes that are taken out of context for Norquist. Neither of you can provide complete quotes. So Norquist tries to get Muslim Americans to take free market positions? That is bad? Are there groups of Americans that we shouldn’t try to educate on different issues?
Again, the book doesn’t mention the terms “Islam” or “Muslim” or any other related word. You guys strike me as racist by citing articles that attack Norquist for mentioning trying to get Muslims to take free market views.
I see no responses to the points on illegal aliens.
If you can’t point to any direct evidence on your claims and you can’t point to anything in the book that backs up the positions you claim Norquist takes, I find these postings pathetic.