Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kickass Conservative; Antoninus
Obama would not look back. That is the difference. I will take a chance on Romney rather than having no chance at all with Obama. Obama’s second term would be a “nothing left to lose” term, not a “lame duck” term.

Romney's own record disputes your hope in him doing the right thing.

2/3rds or 75%, I forget which right now, of his nominees were Democrats, hard-left Democrats who couldn't give a flying leap about the constitution or anything else considered conservative in nature, and you state you hope he would listen to pressure from the base?

He's still lying about implementing Gay Marriage and supporting Gay Adoption while Governor of Massachusetts and you still want to HOPE that he would do the right thing?
65 posted on 03/17/2012 10:07:27 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie
As Governor of MA, Romney had no “base” to rise up and pressure him to seek out more Conservative Nominees. Republicans were outnumbered in the MA Legislature to the point of being reduced to background noise.

I am not defending Romney, just calling it like I see it. This “no difference” between Obama and Romney is ridiculous.

Obama is a Marxist version of a “sure thing”. A President Romney gives us at least a fighting chance to influence his Governing.

I will take a fighting chance with Romney over unconditional surrender to Obama any day of the week.

71 posted on 03/17/2012 10:22:19 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (A day without Obama is like a day without a Tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

[ Obama would not look back. That is the difference. I will take a chance on Romney rather than having no chance at all with Obama. Obama’s second term would be a “nothing left to lose” term, not a “lame duck” term.

Romney’s own record disputes your hope in him doing the right thing.

2/3rds or 75%, I forget which right now, of his nominees were Democrats, hard-left Democrats who couldn’t give a flying leap about the constitution or anything else considered conservative in nature, and you state you hope he would listen to pressure from the base?

He’s still lying about implementing Gay Marriage and supporting Gay Adoption while Governor of Massachusetts and you still want to HOPE that he would do the right thing? ]

We are so screwed if Either Mittens gets in or Barry gets a second term.

Mittens would only slow things down and then in four years the GOP would be blamed so much but with little to show we would still be in an economic malaise the likes of Carter’s wet dreams. This would GUARANTEE a Democrat Victory over the house the senate and even the presidency in 2016. They would not be pulling any punches as they would run someone that would make Obama look like a middle of the road moderate. Because they know they would have a very good chance of winning. Not to mention the class warfare game that could be played to Bolshevik conclusion during that election if we get Romney and mediocre performance out of him which is very much likely.

Of course Obama winning would be a very much “nothing to lose” second term that would see him likely either completely destroying the economy so badly that they play the game of “Destroy and Support” in that they would destroy the economy and then support the people as the “great savior” thus ensuring either “Glorious Revolution” or the mass construction project of making millions more so dependent that they will have a permanent grip on power that would only come undone with Blood sweat and tears, but mostly Blood and Tears.

ABO and ABR, because we either need Newt or Santorum, hell I would take Ron Paul over Romney for the above reason above.


74 posted on 03/17/2012 10:31:37 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson