I asked you a while back to quote a law, ANY LAW, absent somebody's morality at it's base.
Nothing but crickets since.
I’m not a legal scholar, but I know there is a difference between laws that protect individual freedom (murder, rape, theft etc.), and those that seek to undermine it by elevating somebody’s judgement over mine in order to protect me from myself.
Here’s a question for you. How is the thinking that supports the nanny state any different from the thinking that supports full blown socialism?