I have factually refuted that false argument by giving many examples for which that is exactly what is being done by many of our laws.
Therefore, the embarrassment is all yours, unless you can explain to me why murder does not come under the umbrella of 'morality' in your mind.....
btw, you have a very narrow and errant definition of 'morality.' Without making any judgments, since I don't know you, it would make the most sense, from your own words, that you just don't want anyone to tell you that anything you want to do is wrong, which is why you react so emotionally to 'moralists.' But since I don't know you that would just be a wild guess.....
You haven’t factually refuted anything.
You seem unable to differentiate between issues like pornography and murder, and you are all about judgment (look through the thread!).
You also don’t seem to have any idea where internet regulation would lead (I’ll give you a hint - you won’t have forums to moralize on!).
Finally, you are absolutely tone deaf if you think Santorum’s focus on social issues rather than jobs/growth are the keys to electoral victory.
As I said previously, discussing anything with nanny staters is a complete waste of time.
I’m off to enjoy a green beer! (I hope that doesn’t offend your sensibilities!)