Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07

I do recognize the need for local laws regarding obscenity. Mr. Santorum is talking about the Federal Government regulating the internet. I should have said that laws primarily exist.....

Your attempt to open another avenue (abortion) to attack me me was pathetic. You wanted to change the discussion from Santorum’s position on internet regulation. I am pro life, and have stated so on many occasions.


230 posted on 03/17/2012 11:41:52 AM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: trappedincanuckistan
I do recognize the need for local laws regarding obscenity.

Ah, you little statist you..

Mr. Santorum is talking about the Federal Government regulating the internet.

Federal government already regulates the internet. Receiving obscene material on the internet involving real children is against the law. You have a problem with that?

I should have said that laws primarily exist.....

Yes you should have because like everybody else in this country you want your notion of morality to be reflected in the law.

Your attempt to open another avenue (abortion) to attack me me was pathetic. You wanted to change the discussion from Santorum’s position on internet regulation. I am pro life, and have stated so on many occasions

I was curious. You see I think pro choice libertarians are laughable and not worth engaging. Any philosophy that has non-aggression at it's base and is OK with aggression against those among us who can not offer a defense to that aggression is a morally bankrupt philosophy that belongs in the dump. Like the US Libertarian Party.

238 posted on 03/17/2012 11:53:36 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson