Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HKMk23

I was being sarcastic with the comparison. I think both are fallacious premises that rely on manipulating statistics to get people to fall in line. The same as global warming. There was one person who posted that because murderers watched porn, porn makes you likely to murder. That is ridiculous.

My argument is whether or not obscenity laws belong in the Federal Government. If the executive’s job is to enforce the law, then he should. I just think there should be fewer laws. A city can ban porn from billboards, Washington doesnt need to.


164 posted on 03/17/2012 9:32:54 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: Raider Sam

Thanks for the more in-depth clarification. Philosophically we’re on the same page; such laws — if they exist — ought not be the purview of the Federal Government, but at some level closer to the people as the best government is SELF government.


434 posted on 03/19/2012 9:14:26 AM PDT by HKMk23 (Those who are perishing refused to receive the love of the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson