Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: entropy12

That’s nonsense. Due to the various funky winner-take-all and threshold rules in the states, Santorum would have a better shot in states with almost 2/3rds of the delegates without Newt in the race than he would with Newt in the race. Case in point, in AL and MI, Santorum would have gotten all of Newt’s delegates and taken between 11-17 of Romney’s away with Newt out of the race.

Anyone who hasn’t ANALYZED THE MATH of delegates and the specific state allocation rules can only make totally worthless comments as to who would get more delegates under different conditions. If you have analyzed the math, show us your calculations. Otherwise, your comments are beyond useless and are counterproductive.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2859712/posts


35 posted on 03/16/2012 4:35:41 PM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

The Gallup poll says 40% of Newt’s votes would go to Romney and 39% would go to Santorum.

With all those WTA-CD & WTA primaries coming, why do you think Santorum benefits if Newt drops out. Unless of course if the Gallop poll is inaccurate then I will concur with you that Santorum benefits by Newt dropping out.


52 posted on 03/16/2012 5:06:26 PM PDT by entropy12 (Republicans do not hate, that is a monopoly of democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: JediJones
If Santorum was out of the race, then Newt would have gotten all of those delegates!


53 posted on 03/16/2012 5:08:37 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson