Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GladesGuru; allmendream

I remember reading about this.

http://www.crusades-encyclopedia.com/cannibalism.html

It’s not so much historically verified, but it’s at the least hyperbole on the actual goings on. Old wives’ tales, if you will. Remember, the winners write the history.


18 posted on 03/16/2012 11:03:03 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: rarestia
I would say that several independent sources make it about as well historically verified as can be expected.

The winner? The winner of the First Crusade was the Crusaders - and they wrote about cannibalism during the siege of Antioch.

The winner of the entire Crusades was the Muslims (a couple hundred years later) and they TOO wrote about cannibalism during the siege of Antioch.

When both sides of a conflict agree on a point - it is pretty well historically verified.

22 posted on 03/16/2012 11:06:57 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to DC to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson