Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/12/2012 8:21:56 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Nachum

Soledad is the name of a prison.
Apropos...............


2 posted on 03/12/2012 8:30:05 AM PDT by Red Badger (If the Government can make you buy heath insurance, they can make you buy a Volt................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


3 posted on 03/12/2012 8:30:33 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

right, a vid of the teleprompter and fraud fawningly pimping for him....plus the TandF pushed kagen, who edited the paper from bell, calling the constitution, ‘original sin’, on to the supreme court...really?????? zero has no interest in cRT??????

riiiiiiiiight....


4 posted on 03/12/2012 8:31:25 AM PDT by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
After a tough interview with O’Brien last week, Pollak’s Big sites went on a vengeful tirade against the CNN anchor, posting a flurry of articles seeking to discredit her, and promoting their warped vision of Prof. Bell.

Hilarious. It was a tough interview alright - for Soledad Obrien. Pollak made her look like a complete fool.

Anyone who hasn't seen the interview needs to check it out. It was great.

5 posted on 03/12/2012 8:33:24 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Soledad O’Brien’s obsession with all things racial borders on hysteria and paranoia to the extent that I wonder if she’s mentally ill.


6 posted on 03/12/2012 8:36:55 AM PDT by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

So a leftwinger (O’Brien) brings on another leftwinger (Dorothy Brown) to confirm that Critical Race Theory is a nothing-burger.

And then another leftwinger (Tommy Christopher) reports that it’s now officially a non issue - as evidenced by two lefties deeming it so.

LOL!


7 posted on 03/12/2012 8:37:07 AM PDT by nhwingut (Sarah Palin 12... No One Else (Maybe Tim Thomas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Haha . . . I just saw the clip. I really think Soledad O’Brien could benefit from medication. I hear they’re doing wonders with psycho drugs these days.


8 posted on 03/12/2012 8:41:34 AM PDT by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

“...there is also nothing in President Obama’s record to suggest that he is an adherent of it.”

If one considers Eric Holder “nothing”, I guess that would be true.


10 posted on 03/12/2012 8:42:47 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum; Yaelle
...promoting their warped vision of Prof. Bell.
The smear then depends on depicting Professor Bell, who is no longer able to speak in his own defense...

How is using the man's own words, in both video and written form, where he himself defines Critical Race Theory warping what it means? /rhetorical

Look at this, Yaelle, I hadn't even read this article and I called it.
@This is nothing more than a smear campaign.
The MSM and leftists are so predictable.

11 posted on 03/12/2012 8:44:40 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

The real story here is that CNN and Soledad O’Brien have taken it upon themselves to become the defenders of Derrick Bell and his racist yammering.

Probably because they realize that Obama is inextricably connected with Bell, so any acceptance of Bell as a militant racist tarnishes Obama.


12 posted on 03/12/2012 8:48:17 AM PDT by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

What if the first two words in every story you have written for a particular outlet were a blatant effort to mislead your readers?

Such is the case with Mediaite’s Tommy Christopher, whose real name isn’t actually “Tommy Christopher,” the name he uses for his Mediaite byline, The Daily Caller has learned.

Christopher, an admitted “douche” who apparently enjoys karaoke, doesn’t offer a reason for misleading his readers, but a woman identifying herself as Christopher’s girlfriend on Twitter named “Diana Lynn W.” said in a since-deleted tweet it was for reasons “to protect his family”:

Here

In 2009 Christopher was fired by AOL’s Politics Daily, over what some say was an article he wrote criticizing a story about ten conservative women Playboy’s Guy Cimbalo most wanted to “hate fuck.” Christopher also used the “Tommy Christopher” byline while at Politics Daily.

13 posted on 03/12/2012 8:50:53 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
negrosmosis

Racists!

15 posted on 03/12/2012 8:51:49 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Tommy Christopher

17 posted on 03/12/2012 8:58:14 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
This makes the point perfectly (despite the pi$$ing and moaning from some on this forum) that this first video did indeed have teeth and wasn't a dud. Soledad saw her Dear Leader, along with her racist professor having their past scrutinized, and she was having none of it! If we want to know how effective we are, all we need to do is view the reactions from the Left. Soledad knows this vetting will be, to some degree, DAMMING to her Dear Leader.
21 posted on 03/12/2012 9:12:57 AM PDT by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
“Critical Race Theory seeks to explain judicial decisions by asking the question ‘what does race have to do with it?’”

Libtards have a vested interest in making everything about race so that they can use apparent oppression of some as a justification for the use of force to violate natural rights of others.

I see none of Critical Race Theory in President Obama, either in his writings, or what he’s actually done in office.

Because of the above, it would be the worst example of evasion of reality to not see Critical Race Theory in President Obama

24 posted on 03/12/2012 9:16:45 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Didn’t he use to play Squiggy on “Laverne and Shirley?”


25 posted on 03/12/2012 9:16:53 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Mr Media Training

So when “Tommy Christopher” bravely and boldly attacked me on my blog
after Mediaite used my content on Fox News without attribution (see
comments), it wasn’t actually “Tommy Christopher” attacking me?
http://www.mrmediatraining.com....

Mr. Christopher claims that “the pen name has afforded my family freedom
from the harassment that I take on as a public figure.” I’d suggest it
afforded him the freedom to write vicious things about people who don’t
hide behind pseudonyms, while conveniently not having to worry about the
consequences of doing so.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/23/what-is-mediaite-blogger-tommy-christophers-real-name/#ixzz1ov48zEhJ

******

See: What is Mediaite blogger Tommy Christopher’s real name?

Is it possible Tommy Christopher aka Mr. McNulty and his brother - an activist - both fight to keep their real last name secret because they are related to a New York Times executive who seems to only follow liberal bloggers on her Twitter account?

It sure got quiet after I outed Mr. Christopher. I guess we both have no readers or followers on the Twitter.

http://ronbryn.blogspot.com/2012/01/mediaites-tommy-christopher-threatens.html


26 posted on 03/12/2012 9:17:06 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Cnn goes on record as in the bag for Obama.


27 posted on 03/12/2012 9:17:38 AM PDT by lakeman (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
From the comments on the page...

“Translation: O’Brien, having embarrassed herself in her interview with Pollack, brings on someone who makes their bread and butter with Critical Race Theory to defend Critical Race Theory and pretend O’Brien didn’t embarrass herself.

And I’m not speaking as a “Breitbart.com reader”; I’m speaking as a social scientist who’s been in academia for 25 years as a student and professor, one who’s actually taught about critical theory approaches to social science — though you can’t really call any critical theory approach a “science,” since they’re normative, not objective. Let me put it so simply that maybe even someone like O’Brien can understand: things like Critical Race Theory are considered a joke by pretty much any academic who make their living from it. It is the Al Sharpton of academia: a money making scam feeding off racial resentment that is tolerated only because paying them off is considered preferable to the alternative (the sort of building occupations, protests, threats, etc. in the sixties that resulted in these academic positions being created in the first place).”

AND—

The Wikipedia entry for Critical Race Theory “was edited 28 times that day After this exchange. The original talked specifically to white supremacy, and the edited version took it out completely. Before that day, the entry had been edited twice in the last year. Here is a link to the before and after version on Wiki..

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_race_theory&diff=480904326&oldid=474146737

Here is the link for the edits done right after Soledad made a fool of herself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_race_theory&action=history

It is hilarious how liberals will attempt to bend and shape the truth/reality to fit the narrative. They would make the Soviets proud. And the legions of useful idiots here in the US who are unquestionably compliant with the lie, would make them proud too.”

28 posted on 03/12/2012 9:18:54 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson